Mr.PlanB Logo
    Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026
    Ledger
    Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026

    Ansible AAP: Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026 Scorecard

    Red Hat's per-node subscription around ansible-core: deepest orchestration and AI in its group, no list price, upstream controller frozen since 2024.

    Edition October 16, 20269 min read

    Where Ansible Automation Platform put its effort, 2016 to 2026

    Each square is one capability area in one year. The brighter it is, the more the area gained in the Infrastructure Automation Ledger that year; 1, 2 and 3 mark that year's biggest pushes.

    ’16’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
    Provisioning breadth1111
    Configuration management depth22
    State, planning and safety2
    Language and authoring31
    Orchestration and self-service232
    Scale and control plane111
    Security and compliance12
    Bare metal and day-2 operations3
    Ecosystem and integrations2
    AI assistance133
    no change+0.5+1+1.5 or moreScores out of 5 per area.

    Biggest pushes overall: AI assistance (+4), Provisioning breadth (+2), Scale and control plane (+2). Already strong in 2015: Ecosystem and integrations, Configuration management depth, Language and authoring.

    Top focus each year: 2016 Provisioning breadth; 2017 Scale and control plane; 2018 Security and compliance; 2019 Provisioning breadth; 2020 Provisioning breadth; 2021 Scale and control plane; 2023 AI assistance; 2024 Scale and control plane; 2025 Language and authoring; 2026 Provisioning breadth. 1 of 11 years show no gain in any area.

    Part of the Infrastructure Automation Ledger (edition 2026-10-16). How the scores work: methodology.

    Snapshot

    • Type: product (subscription)
    • Owner: Red Hat, Inc. (IBM subsidiary); Red Hat acquired Ansible, Inc. in October 2015
    • Engine: ansible-core (Red Hat's lifecycle page lists 2.16 as the default for 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7, with 2.20 as an execution environment stream); the automation controller is built downstream of AWX, which has had no release since 24.6.1 (2024-07-02) while Red Hat refactors it
    • Licence: Subscription per managed node, Standard (business hours) or Premium (24x7); components are open source (ansible-core GPL-3.0-or-later, AWX Apache-2.0). Red Hat publishes no list price. The AWS Marketplace managed service shows $412.50 a month for 50 managed nodes, with overage at $8.25 per managed active node per month falling to $7.01 at the 10,000-node tier (https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-dk7owvnk45mti, read 2026-10-15)
    • Latest release: 2.7 (2026-06-10); 2.6.4 added the MCP server preview (2026-02-02)
    • Support lifecycle: About three years per release: 2.6 GA 2025-10-01 with maintenance to 2028-10-01, 2.5 to 2027-10-02, 2.4 ended 2026-06-30; no direct upgrade from 2.4 to 2.7; new RHEL installs on 2.7 use the containerized installer only
    • Next milestone: Automation orchestrator "coming soon" (2.7 post, no date); automation dashboard GA planned for later in 2026
    • Targets: Linux, Windows and network devices through ansible-core; certified cloud collections for AWS, Azure and Google; vSphere: vmware.vmware 2.12.0 (Red Hat certified, 2026-10-12) plus community.vmware 7.0.0 (2026-09-27); Nutanix: nutanix.ncp 2.6.0 (Nutanix, certified, 2026-09-23); Hyper-V: microsoft.hyperv 1.1.0 (certified, 2026-05-19); KubeVirt: kubevirt.core 2.3.0 (kubevirt project, 2026-06-10, certification not stated); Proxmox VE: community.proxmox 2.1.0 (community, 2026-10-06, not certified); XCP-ng: no dedicated collection
    • Tier: Configuration management
    • Archetype: Integrated stack with an AI-led roadmap
    • Evidence grade: B. Release content, AI items and the AWX record were read from Red Hat blogs, documentation and the Ansible forum. Lifecycle dates come from endoflife.date because Red Hat's lifecycle table is an image, the only price read is the AWS Marketplace listing, and Tower-era steps before 2021 are dated from secondary sources.

    Scorecard

    DimensionScoreDirection
    Capability today76.6 / 100higher is better
    Momentum since end of 2022+13.1 points (2015 to 2022: +14.7)higher is better
    Credibility16.5 / 25higher is better
    Commercial risk12.0 / 25lower is better
    Technical lock-in8.5 / 25lower is better
    Integrator fit16.5 / 20higher is better
    AI leverage10.5 / 20higher is better
    Ledger Index68.6 / 100balanced weights; see the methodology

    Capability by domain, 2015 to today

    Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.

    Domain (weight)201520192022Today
    Provisioning breadth (15)233.54
    Configuration management depth (12)333.54
    State, planning and safety (12)22.52.52.5
    Language and authoring (10)333.54
    Orchestration and self-service (10)33.53.54.5
    Scale and control plane (8)233.54
    Security and compliance (10)33.53.54
    Bare metal and day-2 operations (8)2.5333
    Ecosystem and integrations (8)3.53.54.54.5
    AI assistance (7)0004
    Total / 10048.857.463.576.6

    Year by year: 2015: 48.8 · 2016: 50.3 · 2017: 52.9 · 2018: 53.9 · 2019: 57.4 · 2020: 61.9 · 2021: 63.5 · 2022: 63.5 · 2023: 69.9 · 2024: 70.7 · 2025: 73.4 · 2026: 76.6

    What moved the score

    YearDomainChangePointsTrigger
    2016Provisioning breadth2 → 2.5+1.5Ansible 2.0: larger cloud and network module set
    2017Orchestration and self-service3 → 3.5+1.0Tower 3.2: workflows chain job templates; AWX opened upstream
    2017Scale and control plane2 → 3+1.6Tower 3.2: clustered controller
    2018Security and compliance3 → 3.5+1.0Tower adds SAML single sign-on and OAuth 2 tokens
    2019Bare metal and day-2 operations2.5 → 3+0.8Ansible 2.9: Redfish BMC and reboot modules in core
    2019Provisioning breadth2.5 → 3+1.5Ansible 2.9: cloud, vSphere, oVirt and network vendor modules before the split
    2019State, planning and safety2 → 2.5+1.2Tower: approval nodes in workflows
    2020Configuration management depth3 → 3.5+1.2Ansible 2.10: Windows and network content as collections
    2020Ecosystem and integrations3.5 → 4+0.8Ansible 2.10: collections and certified partner content
    2020Language and authoring3 → 3.5+1.0Ansible 2.10: namespaced, versioned collections; signed certified content in Automation Hub
    2020Provisioning breadth3 → 3.5+1.5Ansible 2.10: collections; certified vendor content in Automation Hub
    2021Ecosystem and integrations4 → 4.5+0.8Community package 3.0 (2021-02-18) beside a growing certified catalogue with ITSM and marketplace integrations
    2021Scale and control plane3 → 3.5+0.82.0: execution environments and the split control plane, automation mesh follows in 2.1
    2023AI assistance0 → 3+4.2Ansible Lightspeed with IBM watsonx Code Assistant GA (2023-11-01)
    2023Configuration management depth3.5 → 4+1.22.4: Event-Driven Ansible GA lets events trigger remediation playbooks
    2023Orchestration and self-service3.5 → 4+1.02.4: Event-Driven Ansible GA
    2024Scale and control plane3.5 → 4+0.82.5: platform gateway, RPM, containerized and operator installers, enterprise topologies
    2025AI assistance3 → 3.5+0.72.6: Lightspeed intelligent assistant GA
    2025Language and authoring3.5 → 4+1.02.6: coding assistant in VS Code and development workspaces (preview) on top of the 2.19 engine changes
    2025Orchestration and self-service4 → 4.5+1.02.6: self-service automation portal GA; 2.7 adds a visual execution environment builder
    2026AI assistance3.5 → 4+0.72.6.4: official MCP server in technology preview (half step); 2.7: Red Hat AI and Google Gemini model providers GA
    2026Provisioning breadth3.5 → 4+1.5microsoft.hyperv 1.0.0 certified (2026-03-26); vmware.vmware certified; Proxmox and KubeVirt remain community content
    2026Security and compliance3.5 → 4+1.02.7: native OIDC for HashiCorp Vault with short-lived job-scoped tokens; shared RBAC across controller, EDA and hub since 2.5

    Direction, 2023 to 2026

    Each release item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).

    DateItemThemeDriver
    2023-062.4: Event-Driven Ansible GAOrchestrationV
    2023-11Ansible Lightspeed with IBM watsonx Code Assistant GAAIP
    2024-05AWX refactor announced; upstream releases paused after 24.6.1 (2024-07-02)PackagingP
    2024-08AWX Operator removed from OperatorHub; Helm chart handed to the communityPackagingP
    2024-092.5: platform gateway and one UI with shared RBAC; new installs only at launchOrchestrationC
    2025-102.6: self-service automation portal GAOrchestrationC
    2025-102.6: Lightspeed intelligent assistant GA; automation dashboardAIV
    2025-102.6: Ansible development workspaces (technology preview)LanguageV
    2025-12Coding assistant adds Google Gemini as a model providerAIC
    2026-022.6.4: MCP server in technology previewAIV
    2026-032.4 end of maintenance 2026-06-30; RPM installs end after 2.6; no direct 2.4 to 2.7 upgradePackagingP
    2026-03microsoft.hyperv 1.0.0 certified collectionProvisioning breadthM
    2026-062.7: containerized installer only for new RHEL installs; Growth topologyPackagingP
    2026-062.7: native OIDC for HashiCorp Vault with short-lived job tokensSecurityP
    2026-062.7: visual execution environment builder and content discoveryLanguageC
    2026-06Automation orchestrator announced as "coming soon"OrchestrationV
    2026-10vmware.vmware 2.12.0 certified collectionProvisioning breadthM
    • Centre of gravity: Orchestration (4), AI (4), Packaging (4)
    • Blind spots (no items): Configuration management, State and planning, Scale, Bare metal, Ecosystem, Licensing
    • Driver mix: Vision 29%, Customer need 24%, Market window 12%, Upstream 0%, Portfolio 35%
    • Idea-to-need index: 0.45 (0 = demand-pulled, 1 = thesis-pushed)

    Credibility: 16.5 / 25

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Cadence3.5Majors on 2023-06-27, 2024-09-30, 2025-10-01 and 2026-06-10 (15, 12 and 8 month gaps); dates are not published in advance
    Roadmap transparency2.5Public release notes and lifecycle page; direction appears in blogs and keynotes, no dated roadmap, and the AWX upstream published no plan for 18 months
    Say-do3.53 of 6 AI items GA; MCP server and bring-your-own-knowledge still preview; orchestrator pending without a date
    Velocity4Several substantive capabilities per release since 2.5
    Lifecycle stability3About three years per release, but 2.5 shipped without an upgrade path, RPM installs end after 2.6 and 2.4 has no direct path to 2.7

    Commercial risk: 12.0 / 25 (lower is better)

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Price and licence volatility2No licence change found; with no public list price, changes cannot be checked
    Purchase constraints3.5Subscription only, per managed node, quote based; no free production tier
    Channel and access2Direct, partners and cloud marketplaces; downloads and patches need an active subscription
    Owner stability1.5Long-term owner IBM; IBM also owns HashiCorp, so Terraform now sits in the same portfolio
    Cost of staying supported3Three-year windows, installer migrations, RHEL 9 move for 2.6, default ansible-core pinned at 2.16

    Technical lock-in: 8.5 / 25 (lower is better)

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Formats1.5Playbooks and rulebooks are open YAML; controller objects live in the platform database
    Export path2.5Playbooks run on community ansible-core; job templates, workflows and schedules need rebuilding, and the AWX exit path has not shipped since 2024
    Stack coupling2.52.7 new installs need RHEL 9.6 or later, RHEL 10 or OpenShift, plus PostgreSQL 15 to 17 and Redis
    Hardware / cloud coupling0.5Any server; air-gapped topologies supported; managed options optional
    Skills and tooling coupling1.5Common Ansible skills plus product-specific execution environments, hub and mesh

    Integrator fit: 16.5 / 20

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Partner programme openness4Red Hat Partner Connect for certified content, reseller channel and marketplace listings; terms not read
    Multi-tenancy and self-service4.5Organizations, teams, shared RBAC since 2.5, self-service portal GA since 2.6
    API and infrastructure-as-code4REST API behind the platform gateway; configuration as code through collections
    Skills and certification4Exam-based Red Hat certifications and a large talent pool

    AI leverage: 10.5 / 20

    How the product uses AI, scored per year like capability. Only GA counts.

    Criterion20192022TodayLatest step
    AI code and plan generation003.52026: 2.7: coding assistant adds Red Hat AI and Google Gemini beside watsonx
    AI platform stack0012025: 2.6: bring-your-own-model for the assistant through Red Hat AI, OpenAI or Azure OpenAI; no AI platform of its own
    AI-assisted operations0032025: 2.6: Lightspeed intelligent assistant GA in the platform UI; bring-your-own-knowledge still technology preview in 2.7
    Agent openness2232026: 2.6.4: official MCP server in technology preview with read-only and read-write modes and RBAC inheritance

    Year by year: 2015: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2026: 10.5

    AI say-do, 2023 to 2026: 6 AI items announced; 3 GA, 2 still preview, 1 pending, 0 dropped. GA: Lightspeed code generation, the intelligent assistant and the extra model providers; preview: the MCP server and bring-your-own-knowledge; pending: the automation orchestrator.

    Red Hat ships AI for writing and explaining automation and for chatting with the platform, and both are generally available. The agent interface is still a technology preview after two releases, so an agent-driven estate on it runs outside production support today.

    Reading

    Ansible Automation Platform scores highest in its group because it adds everything the engine lacks: scheduling, workflows, event-driven runs, a self-service portal, shared RBAC and generally available AI assistance. Its credibility is held back by a roadmap that lives in blog posts and by packaging churn, with installer changes and missing upgrade paths across 2.4, 2.5 and 2.7. The buyer's main check is the upstream: AWX has not released since July 2024, Red Hat's refactor shipped only as an untagged container image, so the open exit path for the controller is weaker than it was. Price must be requested, and the AWS listing is the only public figure to compare against.

    Open questions and items to re-score

    • Tower-era dates for workflows (2017), clustering (2017) and SAML single sign-on (2018) are from general knowledge, not from pages read; versions were left out where unverified.
    • Whether the automation dashboard is GA or technology preview: the 2.6 advisory says GA, the 2.7 post calls new in-platform reports a technology preview.
    • Policy as code and FIPS status were not found in the sources read.
    • Exact support dates for 2.7 were not published in the pages read.
    • Which AWX commit the 2.6 and 2.7 controllers are built from; a forum question from 2025-10 had no answer.
    • Reseller prices (about $19,700 to $25,000 for 100 nodes a year) could not be fetched and are not used.
    • The date IBM closed the HashiCorp acquisition was not fetched.

    Related reading

    More from Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026