croit: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
A small German vendor's management layer and support for upstream Ceph: fast monthly releases and NVMe-oF failover, with no public price list or support policy.
Where croit put its effort, 2018 to 2026
Each square is one capability area in one year. The brighter it is, the more the area gained in the Virtualization Storage Ledger that year; 1, 2 and 3 mark that year's biggest pushes.
| ’18 | ’19 | ’20 | ’21 | ’22 | ’23 | ’24 | ’25 | ’26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data services core | 3 | ||||||||
| Resilience and HA | |||||||||
| Performance and protocols | 1 | ||||||||
| Hypervisor integration | |||||||||
| Scale and topology | 1 | ||||||||
| Data protection and DR | |||||||||
| Security | |||||||||
| Operations and automation | 2 | ||||||||
| Hardware and deployment freedom | 2 | ||||||||
| Kubernetes and containers |
Biggest pushes overall: Performance and protocols (+1), Operations and automation (+1), Data services core (+0.5). Already strong in 2017: Hardware and deployment freedom, Data services core, Resilience and HA.
Top focus each year: 2024 Scale and topology; 2026 Performance and protocols. 7 of 9 years show no gain in any area.
Part of the Virtualization Storage Ledger (edition 2026-10-16). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Type: product
- Owner: croit GmbH, Germany; founded January 2017 by Martin Verges and Matthias Grandl; privately owned by Verges, Grandl and Andy Muthmann with no outside capital (vendor statement); Ceph Foundation General member since 2018-11-12; Proxmox Gold Partner
- Engine: Ceph (upstream builds by croit, Reef 18.2.8 and Tentacle 20.2.x) on an AlmaLinux-based immutable OS image served by PXE
- Licence: Commercial software licence; SLAs only with a licence; two image variants since v2608.0, Core (upstream Ceph built and patched by croit) and Enhanced (croit's own Ceph build, stated to stay open source and upstream compatible); prices and metric not published (pricing page 404 on 2026-10-15)
- Latest release: v2609.0 (September 2026 by version label, post undated), shipping Ceph Tentacle 20.2.4
- Support lifecycle: Not published. Observed: Reef and Tentacle supported, Squid skipped ("upgrade directly to Tentacle"); 24/7 premium support sold as a service
- Next milestone: None published
- Hypervisors: Proxmox VE and other KVM hosts natively over RBD (croit Proxmox VE arm64 post, Gold Partner); VMware or Hyper-V only through the iSCSI or NVMe-oF export (v2609.0 post); no vSphere plug-in and no validated VMware target found
- Tier: Ceph family
- Archetype: Dependable builder
- Evidence grade: C. Features come from croit's release posts for v2605 to v2609 and its about and solutions pages; the posts carry no dates, so months are read from the year-month version labels. docs.croit.io returned 503 and the pricing page 404 on 2026-10-15, so prices, licence terms and support windows are unverified. The company's founding year and ownership come from its own about page and the 2018 Ceph Foundation launch release. Steps before 2024 are inferred from the upstream Ceph the product managed and are grade C.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 70.8 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +11.5 points (2017 to 2022: +0.0) | higher is better |
| Credibility | 14.5 / 25 | higher is better |
| Commercial risk | 12.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 7.5 / 25 | lower is better |
| Integrator fit | 9.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 3.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 58.0 / 100 | balanced weights; see the methodology |
Capability by domain, 2015 to today
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2015 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data services core (15) | n/a | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 |
| Resilience and HA (15) | n/a | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 |
| Performance and protocols (12) | n/a | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| Hypervisor integration (12) | n/a | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 |
| Scale and topology (10) | n/a | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 |
| Data protection and DR (10) | n/a | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 |
| Security (8) | n/a | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 |
| Operations and automation (8) | n/a | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Hardware and deployment freedom (5) | n/a | 4 | 4 | 4.5 |
| Kubernetes and containers (5) | n/a | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Total / 100 | n/a | 59.3 | 59.3 | 70.8 |
Year by year: 2017: 59.3 · 2018: 59.3 · 2019: 59.3 · 2020: 59.3 · 2021: 59.3 · 2022: 59.3 · 2023: 59.3 · 2024: 60.8 · 2025: 60.8 · 2026: 70.8
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hardware and deployment freedom | 4 → 4.5 | +0.5 | v2404.1: x86_64 and Arm nodes in one cluster (Arm preview images since 2018); management container x86-64 only |
| 2024 | Scale and topology | 3.5 → 4 | +1.0 | v2404.1: separate default OS images for x86_64 and Arm nodes in one cluster |
| 2026 | Data protection and DR | 2.5 → 3 | +1.0 | v2607.0: S3 multisite across clusters with promote-surviving-zone, configuration backup to S3; v2608.0 Enhanced: CephFS mirroring with snapdiff; no orchestrated failover, no immutable snapshots |
| 2026 | Data services core | 3.5 → 4 | +1.5 | v2607.0: Tentacle 20.2.2 default for new clusters, bringing FastEC; v2609.0 ships 20.2.4; no deduplication |
| 2026 | Hypervisor integration | 2.5 → 3 | +1.2 | v2609.0: NVMe-oF export with gateway failover for non-KVM hosts; Proxmox VE integration documented and croit is a Proxmox Gold Partner; still no vSphere plug-in or Hyper-V path |
| 2026 | Operations and automation | 3 → 4 | +1.6 | v2605.1: guardrails against reboots that would make PGs inactive and PXE subnet checks; v2609.0: OSD replacement wizard, OS images as extendable OCI containers, IPv6-only clusters; Terraform and Ansible not found |
| 2026 | Performance and protocols | 2.5 → 3.5 | +2.4 | v2607.0: SMB gateway rebuilt with POSIX or Windows ACLs and AD idmap, load-balanced S3 (v2608.0); v2609.0: NVMe-oF export with failover; no Fibre Channel, no published benchmarks |
| 2026 | Resilience and HA | 3.5 → 4 | +1.5 | v2609.0: NVMe-oF export served by several gateways, one active and others standby, with exclusive-lock fencing; stretch mode not mentioned in croit's posts |
| 2026 | Security | 2.5 → 3 | +0.8 | v2605: AlmaLinux CVE fixes with an image changelog; v2608.0: CephFS Guard ransomware and malicious client detection (experimental); v2609.0: Tentacle 20.2.4 with the CephX authentication bypass fix CVE-2025-30156 and three more CVEs (2026-08-19), with a key renewal guide |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each release item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04 | v2404.1: separate default OS images for x86_64 and Arm nodes | Hardware | C |
| 2026-05 | v2605.0: images with Reef 18.2.8 and Tentacle 20.2.1; AlmaLinux CVE fixes with an image changelog | Security | U |
| 2026-05 | v2605.1: reboot guardrails and PXE subnet check | Operations | C |
| 2026-07 | v2607.0: Tentacle 20.2.2 default for new clusters; Squid skipped | Packaging | U |
| 2026-07 | v2607.0: S3 multisite across clusters with promote-surviving-zone; configuration backup to S3 | Data protection | C |
| 2026-07 | v2607.0: SMB gateway rebuilt with AD idmap and Windows ACLs | Performance | C |
| 2026-08 | v2608.0: croit Enhanced variant, croit's own Ceph build beside Core | Packaging | V |
| 2026-08 | v2608.0: CephFS Guard ransomware detection (experimental) | Security | V |
| 2026-08 | v2608.0: CephFS mirroring with snapdiff, MDS notifications over UDP or Kafka, load-balanced S3 | Data protection | C |
| 2026-08 | Storage layer for Proxmox VE arm64 after Proxmox's official arm64 build (2026-08-05) | Hypervisor integration | M |
| 2026-09 | v2609.0: NVMe-oF export with active and standby gateways and exclusive-lock fencing | Resilience | C |
| 2026-09 | v2609.0: OSD replacement wizard, OS images as OCI containers, IPv6-only clusters | Operations | C |
| 2026-09 | v2609.0: backend rewritten from Kotlin to Go | Operations | V |
| 2026-09 | v2609.0: Tentacle 20.2.4 with the CephX bypass fix and a key renewal guide | Security | U |
| 2026-09 | aiplane (formerly croit LLM Gateway): separate AGPL-3.0 gateway product for models, agents and MCP tools; release date not stated | AI | V |
- Centre of gravity: Security (3), Operations (3), Packaging (2)
- Blind spots (no items): Data services, Scale, Kubernetes, Licensing
- Driver mix: Vision 27%, Customer need 47%, Market window 7%, Upstream 20%, Portfolio 0%
- Idea-to-need index: 0.33 (0 = demand-pulled, 1 = thesis-pushed)
Credibility: 14.5 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 3.5 | Year-month version labels show a near-monthly rhythm (v2605, v2607, v2608, v2609), but the posts carry no dates and no schedule is published |
| Roadmap transparency | 1.5 | Release posts only; no roadmap, no public tracker, documentation unreachable on 2026-10-15 |
| Say-do | 3 | No dated promises to check; experimental items are labelled as such |
| Velocity | 4 | Several substantive items per release in 2026: SMB rebuild, S3 multisite, Enhanced variant, NVMe-oF failover |
| Lifecycle stability | 2.5 | Backend language rewrite, a new Core and Enhanced split and a skipped Squid in one year; no support windows published |
Commercial risk: 12.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Price and licence volatility | 2.5 | No public price or metric; a second edition appeared in 2026 with no statement on cost |
| Purchase constraints | 2.5 | Licence required for any SLA; terms not public; no free tier found |
| Channel and access | 2.5 | Direct sales and consulting only; pricing page 404 and documentation 503 when checked |
| Owner stability | 2.5 | Small founder-owned company with no outside capital; stability depends on three people |
| Cost of staying supported | 2 | Unknown; the Core image runs upstream Ceph and monthly releases suggest frequent but small updates |
Technical lock-in: 7.5 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 0.5 | Stock Ceph: RBD, CephFS, S3 |
| Export path | 1.5 | Core is upstream Ceph and Enhanced can switch back to Core without data migration; leaving croit for plain Ceph is not documented |
| Stack coupling | 2.5 | PXE-booted immutable OS images replace cephadm; the management node is a single x86-64 component |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 1 | Commodity x86 and Arm servers; croit also sells servers; no cloud attach |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 2 | croit UI, REST API and templates on top of Ceph skills |
Integrator fit: 9.5 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Partner programme openness | 2 | No partner programme found; croit itself is a Proxmox Gold Partner and sells direct |
| Multi-tenancy and self-service | 2.5 | Pools, RGW multisite, SMB users and groups; no self-service portal |
| API and infrastructure-as-code | 3 | REST API, event scripts and configuration templates; no Terraform or Ansible content found |
| Skills and certification | 2 | croit offers consulting and training; no certification |
AI leverage: 3.5 / 20
How the product uses AI, scored per year like capability. Only GA counts.
| Criterion | 2019 | 2022 | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI workload infrastructure | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2017: S3 and CephFS for data; no GPU data path |
| AI platform stack | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 2026: aiplane, an OpenAI-compatible gateway to models, agents and MCP tools, sold as a separate AGPL-3.0 product that does not mention the storage platform |
| AI-assisted operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2017: None shipped; croit describes internal AI support triage and an internal MCP server over its interface, with no statement that either is a product feature |
| Agent openness | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2017: REST API and event scripts; an MCP server is described as internal, product status unclear |
Year by year: 2017: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2026: 3.5
AI say-do, 2023 to 2026: 3 AI items announced; 1 GA, 0 still preview, 2 pending, 0 dropped. aiplane is released; the MCP control server and the support triage are described as internal tools with no shipping statement.
croit uses AI inside its own support process and sells a separate model gateway, but the storage product itself has no AI feature and no official agent interface beyond the REST API. If the internal MCP server ships, the agent strand should be re-scored.
Reading
croit delivers upstream Ceph with a management layer that moved fast in 2026: NVMe-oF with gateway failover, a rebuilt SMB gateway, S3 multisite and an Enhanced build of Ceph, all within five releases. Its capability therefore tracks the engine closely, and the half steps it loses are where croit's own pages do not confirm what the engine can do, such as stretch mode, mirroring in the UI and encryption at rest. The scores carry the lowest evidence grade in the group because the vendor publishes no prices, no support windows and no release dates, and its documentation was unreachable when checked. Ask for the licence terms and the support policy in writing before anything else.
Open questions and items to re-score
- Price list, metric and licence terms were not found; the pricing page returned 404.
- Support period per release and the upgrade policy are unpublished; docs.croit.io returned 503 on 2026-10-15.
- Real release dates for v2605 to v2609 are inferred from version labels.
- Whether RBD mirroring, stretch mode and encryption at rest are exposed in the croit product was not found.
- Whether croit validates VMware ESXi as a target over iSCSI or NVMe-oF was not found.
- First production release date of the croit product was not found; scoring starts with the company's founding year.
- Whether the internal MCP server and the Enhanced variant carry extra cost was not stated.
Related reading
More from Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Virtualization Storage Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Blockbridge: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Ceph: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- IBM Ceph: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- JovianDSS: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Lightbits: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- LINSTOR: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Longhorn: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Nutanix AOS: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- ONTAP Select: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- OpenShift ODF: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Portworx: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- PowerFlex: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Proxmox Ceph: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- S2D: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Sangfor aSAN: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- SANsymphony: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- SimpliVity: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- simplyblock: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- SmartX ZBS: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- StarWind VSAN: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- StorPool: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- SvSAN: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Virtuozzo: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- vSAN: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- XOSTOR: Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard