Virtualization Storage Ledger · edition

Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026: 26 Platforms Scored

Where each shared storage platform stands, and where it is heading. Scored on what shipped. The overview puts every angle and an overall index in one place; the map below compares any two scores. Click a platform anywhere for its full scorecard.

The Virtualization Storage Ledger scores 26 shared storage for virtualization platforms (25 ranked) on capability, credibility, buyer risk, lock-in and AI, using public release records only (edition 2026-10-16). Top 5 by Ledger Index out of 100: Ceph (67.4), IBM Storage Ceph (66), Nutanix AOS (64.3), Storage Spaces Direct (62.8), OpenShift Data Foundation (62.3). The full table is below; each name links to its scorecard, and the methodology explains every score.

2026
Compare: pick up to 8 for All angles, the trend chart and the map arrows

Ledger overview

Capability
Ledger Index
Capability trend, 2015 to 2026

Map view

How to read this map
  • Each point is one platform today. Its label shows the name, then its two scores, e.g. "Cap 69.5 · Cred 18" means capability 69.5 and credibility 18.
  • Up and right is better on every view. Risk axes are drawn upside down for that reason: low risk sits at the top.
  • The shaded corner is above the halfway mark on both axes; the dashed lines are those halfway marks.
  • Arrows show how far a platform moved since the end of 2022. Only capability and AI are scored per year, so arrows only move along those axes; the other scores describe the 2023 to 2026 record.
  • Colour and shape show what mostly drives the vendor's roadmap. Entries marked not ranked fail an inclusion test; their scores are for reference only.
  • Arrows appear for the platforms picked in Compare. Hover any point for its numbers, or click it for the full scorecard.

All scores

Virtualization Storage Ledger 2026: 26 Platforms Scored: ranking by Ledger Index (risk and lock-in: lower is better)
#NameLedger Index /100Capability /100Credibility /25Commercial risk /25Lock-in /25AI /20Archetype
1Ceph (upstream)67.480.51973Dependable builder
2IBM Storage Ceph (formerly Red Hat Ceph Storage)66831711.583Dependable builder
3Nutanix AOS distributed storage (inside Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure)64.383.51711.514.57.5Sharp opportunist
4Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct and Azure Local storage62.873.317.511.5127Integrated stack
5Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation62.373.316.513.511.54Dependable builder
6LINBIT LINSTOR with DRBD (LINBIT SDS)61.473.117853Dependable builder
7Proxmox VE hyper-converged Ceph6168.516.576.53Steady upstream tracker
8Portworx Enterprise (Portworx by Pure Storage)60.871.31613.5125Dependable builder
9VMware vSAN (inside VMware Cloud Foundation)60.784.3172115.56Rent extractor with a reference product
10DataCore SANsymphony59.876.815.514105Dependable builder, slow on dates
11NetApp ONTAP Select58.374.813.512.5124.5Slow follower, steadily maintained
12Lightbits (Lightbits Labs)5864.515.511.58.52Dependable builder
13croit (Ceph management and support)5870.814.5127.53.5Dependable builder
14SUSE Longhorn (storage of SUSE Virtualization)57.960.317.58.5112Dependable builder
15StorPool Storage56.865.315118.52Dependable builder
16Dell PowerFlex54.974.712.51315.55Sharp opportunist, thinly documented
17SmartX ZBS (SMTX OS)53.471.413.514142Dependable builder, low transparency
18Open-E JovianDSS53.163.31310.57.52Dependable builder for two-node sites
19Blockbridge52.864.712.51283Dependable builder with a quiet core
20simplyblock51.364.513139.53Sharp opportunist
21Virtuozzo Storage (inside Virtuozzo Infrastructure)50.361.5141511.53Sharp opportunist in a rebrand year
22StarWind Virtual SAN49.157.913.5147.52Dependable builder under new ownership
23StorMagic SvSAN48.655.21410.57.51Sharp opportunist at the edge
24Vates XOSTOR for XCP-ng47.344.916107.51.5Dependable builder, young product
25HPE SimpliVity45.659.6131615.52.5Integrated stack in transition

Capability /100. Ten domains scored 0 to 5 against fixed anchors, weighted to 100. The buyer lens changes the weights, not the domain scores. History from 2015 uses the same anchors, so a line rises only when something ships.

Credibility /25. Cadence, roadmap transparency, say-do record, velocity and lifecycle stability, from the 2023 to 2026 release record.

Commercial risk and technical lock-in /25 each. Lower is better, so these axes are drawn reversed. Buyer risk is the two added together, out of 50.

AI leverage /20. Four strands scored per year: AI workload infrastructure, AI platform stack, AI-assisted operations and agent openness. Only GA counts; previews count half a step at most.

Ledger Index /100. A weighted blend of all parts, always shown with them. Before 2023 only capability and AI move; the other parts are held at today's values.

Idea-to-need index. Share of vision-led items among vision, customer and market-window items. 0 means demand-pulled, 1 means thesis-pushed. It is a direction, not a grade.