Quantum ActiveScale: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
Quantum ActiveScale pairs geo-spread erasure coding with a tape-backed Glacier class on qualified hardware, from an owner that reshaped its finances in 2025.
Where ActiveScale put its effort, 2016 to 2026
Each square is one capability area in one year. The brighter it is, the more the area gained in the Object Storage Ledger that year; 1, 2 and 3 mark that year's biggest pushes.
| ’16 | ’17 | ’18 | ’19 | ’20 | ’21 | ’22 | ’23 | ’24 | ’25 | ’26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 API fidelity | 1 | 3 | |||||||||
| Immutability and compliance | 1 | ||||||||||
| Durability and resilience | 3 | ||||||||||
| Performance and scale | |||||||||||
| Deployment freedom | |||||||||||
| Security and multi-tenancy | |||||||||||
| Operations | |||||||||||
| Protocols beyond S3 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Lifecycle and tiering | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||
| Ecosystem and openness |
Biggest pushes overall: Immutability and compliance (+3), Protocols beyond S3 (+2.5), Lifecycle and tiering (+2.5). Already strong in 2015: Durability and resilience, Performance and scale, Operations.
Top focus each year: 2019 S3 API fidelity; 2021 Immutability and compliance; 2024 Protocols beyond S3; 2025 Lifecycle and tiering. 7 of 11 years show no gain in any area.
Part of the Object Storage Ledger (edition 2026-10-16). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Type: product
- Owner: Quantum Corporation (Nasdaq: QMCO, USA); Hugues Meyrath became President and CEO on 2025-06-02 after Jamie Lerner stepped down, and the CFO changed the same day (SEC 8-K); Quantum's FY2026 Q4 release (2026-06-24) reports revenue up 27% and says completed transactions eliminated its outstanding debt (vendor); the line descends from Amplidata and Western Digital (deal dates not verified in sources read)
- Licence: Commercial; sold with Quantum P200, X200 and Z200 platforms (earlier P100 and X100) or on qualified Supermicro X12 and Cisco S3260 M5 servers; metric and price not public; the 7.2 hardware refresh brought no pricing change
- Latest release: ActiveScale 7.3.1 (July 2026, maintenance: X200 chassis replacement, tape space reclamation fix, mitigation for CVE-2026-31431); 7.3.0 (May 2026, downloads page, notes not read); 7.2 (August 2025); 7.1 (February 2025); 7.0 (March 2024)
- Support lifecycle: End of support dates not found; 7.3.1 upgrades from 7.1 or higher; no downgrade
- Next milestone: none published
- Object lock: Chosen at bucket creation, cannot be turned off, requires versioning, optional default retention in days or years; a replication destination must also have Object Lock (View guide); governance or compliance mode and legal hold are not named in the documentation read, so they are unverified; Veeam Ready Object with Immutability (vendor press 2021-02-16), Capacity Target with immutability for 6.5 and 7.0 (Veeam article 970, 2024-05-23, IAM and STS not supported) and Archive Target for 7.3 with Veeam 13 (article 1766, 2025-12-18, immutability tested only with Veeam 12); no Commvault, Rubrik, NetBackup or Cohasset document found
- Tier: Appliance or hardware-bound
- Archetype: Dependable builder
- Evidence grade: B. The ActiveScale 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3.1 release notes PDFs, the ActiveScale View bucket guide, two Veeam Ready listings (articles 970 and 1766) and the 2025-06 SEC 8-K were read directly, so the 2024 to 2026 steps are grade A or B. The Amplidata and Western Digital history, the Object Lock start (5.7) and the finances after 2025-06 come from press and search summaries (grade B or C), and all scores before 2023 are grade C.
Scope of the scores: Hardware-bound. ActiveScale is sold on Quantum platforms or qualified Supermicro and Cisco servers; no VM, container or software-only build was found. The scores cover the software; the hardware coupling shows in deployment freedom and lock-in.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 62.0 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +11.5 points (2015 to 2022: +13.8) | higher is better |
| Credibility | 14.5 / 25 | higher is better |
| Commercial risk | 15.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 14.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Integrator fit | 10.0 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 4.0 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 51.6 / 100 | balanced weights; see the methodology |
Capability by domain, 2015 to today
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2015 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 API fidelity (15) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Immutability and compliance (12) | 0 | 0 | 2.5 | 3 |
| Durability and resilience (12) | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Performance and scale (12) | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Deployment freedom (10) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2 |
| Security and multi-tenancy (10) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 |
| Operations (10) | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Protocols beyond S3 (7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 |
| Lifecycle and tiering (7) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4.5 |
| Ecosystem and openness (5) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Total / 100 | 36.7 | 44.5 | 50.5 | 62.0 |
Year by year: 2015: 36.7 · 2016: 36.7 · 2017: 36.7 · 2018: 36.7 · 2019: 44.5 · 2020: 44.5 · 2021: 50.5 · 2022: 50.5 · 2023: 50.5 · 2024: 61.3 · 2025: 62.0 · 2026: 62.0
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Durability and resilience | 3.5 → 4 | +1.2 | ActiveScale: two-dimensional erasure coding with Dynamic Data Placement and Dynamic Data Repair, 3-GEO systems up to 200 ms apart, 2-site replication per bucket (vendor and limits table; year grade C); 7.1 rebuilds only the requested byte range on ranged reads with a node down; rebuild tests not published |
| 2019 | Lifecycle and tiering | 2 → 3 | +1.4 | Lifecycle rules with expiration and transition (grade C) |
| 2019 | Operations | 2.5 → 3 | +1.0 | ActiveScale View console, REST API and CLI, Cloud Based Analytics (year grade C); 7.1 automated scale-out; no downgrade path; no Prometheus or Terraform found |
| 2019 | Performance and scale | 2.5 → 3 | +1.2 | ActiveScale X100 and P100 scale-out systems (grade C) |
| 2019 | S3 API fidelity | 2 → 3 | +3.0 | ActiveScale: S3 with versioning, multipart and lifecycle rules (grade C for the year) |
| 2021 | Immutability and compliance | 0 → 2.5 | +6.0 | Object Lock (from release 5.7, search summary) with default retention; Veeam Ready Object with Immutability (2021-02-16, vendor press); modes and legal hold not documented |
| 2024 | Deployment freedom | 1.5 → 2 | +1.0 | 7.0: any node count of three or more; 7.1 qualifies Cisco S3260 M5 and 7.2 Supermicro X12 servers; still no VM, container or software-only build |
| 2024 | Immutability and compliance | 2.5 → 3 | +1.2 | Veeam Ready Capacity Target with immutability for 6.5 and 7.0 (2024-05-23); Archive Target for 7.3 (2025-12-18); 7.1 IAM conditions can cap lock duration; still no documented modes, legal hold or independent assessment |
| 2024 | Lifecycle and tiering | 3 → 4 | +1.4 | ActiveScale Cold Storage: S3 Glacier class on LTO tape libraries with restore, qualified as a Veeam Archive Tier (2024-10); SAS tape connector in 7.0; introducing year of Cold Storage not found |
| 2024 | Performance and scale | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | 7.0: Z200 NVMe all-flash nodes, linear scale-out with any count of three or more nodes; up to 100 billion objects on three Z200 nodes and 30 billion on a 3-GEO X200 system (limits table); no independent benchmark |
| 2024 | Protocols beyond S3 | 0 → 2.5 | +3.5 | NFS volumes (UDA volumes, up to 65,535 exports) documented with 7.0, not yet on scale-out nodes; introducing release not found; no SMB, Swift or HDFS |
| 2024 | S3 API fidelity | 3 → 3.5 | +1.5 | 7.0: IAM-compatible access control; 7.1 (2025): IAM policy conditions and variables, ranged restore from the Glacier class; multipart up to 10,000 parts of 5 MB to 5 GB; STS not supported (Veeam); SSE and event notifications not verified |
| 2024 | Security and multi-tenancy | 2 → 2.5 | +1.0 | 7.0: IAM users, groups and policies; 7.2 (2025) adds TOTP MFA for administrators; no SAML, OIDC, LDAP, KMIP or FIPS statement found; STS not supported |
| 2025 | Lifecycle and tiering | 4 → 4.5 | +0.7 | 7.1: ranged restore from the Glacier class; 7.2: faster tape restores; tag-based policies and chargeback reporting not verified |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each release item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03 | 7.0: Z200 all-flash NVMe platform | Performance | C |
| 2024-03 | 7.0: IAM-compatible access control | Security | C |
| 2024-03 | 7.0: linear scale-out with any node count of three or more, SAS tape connector, 22 TB drives | Deployment | C |
| 2024-05 | Veeam Ready Capacity Target listing for ActiveScale 6.5 and 7.0 with immutability | Immutability | M |
| 2024-10 | Veeam partnership update: ActiveScale Cold Storage as a Veeam Archive Tier | Lifecycle | M |
| 2025-02 | 7.1: IAM policy conditions and variables, ranged restore from the Glacier class, automated scale-out | Lifecycle | C |
| 2025-08 | 7.2: TOTP MFA for administrators, Ubuntu 20.04 base, X12 hardware refresh, faster tape restores | Security | C |
| 2025-08 | ASI Solutions launches the InfiniStor cloud service on ActiveScale | Ecosystem | M |
| 2025-11 | Ranged restore for Glacier-class archives promoted with a 5x small object restore claim | Lifecycle | M |
| 2025-12 | Veeam Ready Archive Target listing for ActiveScale 7.3 with Veeam 13 | Immutability | M |
| 2026-01 | Telestream DIVA certified with ActiveScale and ActiveScale Cold Storage | Ecosystem | M |
| 2026-07 | 7.3.1: X200 chassis replacement flexibility, tape space reclamation fix, CVE-2026-31431 mitigation | Security | C |
- Centre of gravity: Security (3), Lifecycle (3), Immutability (2)
- Blind spots (no items): S3 API, Durability, Operations, Protocols, Packaging, Licensing, AI
- Driver mix: Vision 0%, Customer need 50%, Market window 50%, Upstream 0%, Portfolio 0%
- Idea-to-need index: 0.00 (0 = demand-pulled, 1 = thesis-pushed)
Credibility: 14.5 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 3.5 | 7.0 (2024-03), 7.1 (2025-02), 7.2 (2025-08), 7.3.0 (2026-05) and 7.3.1 (2026-07), each with a dated public PDF |
| Roadmap transparency | 2 | Public release notes and limits; no roadmap |
| Say-do | 3.5 | Every dated item found shipped (Z200, IAM, ranged restore, admin MFA, Veeam 13 listing); few forward promises exist to test |
| Velocity | 3 | Z200, IAM, MFA and ranged restore across 24 months; 7.3.x is maintenance |
| Lifecycle stability | 2.5 | Upgrades only from recent releases and no downgrade; Ubuntu 20.04 base in 2025; company management turnover |
Commercial risk: 15.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Price and licence volatility | 2.5 | No public prices, so changes cannot be seen; the 7.2 refresh kept pricing |
| Purchase constraints | 3.5 | Three or four node appliance minimum on qualified hardware; quote only |
| Channel and access | 2.5 | Public release notes and documentation; downloads and support through MyQuantum |
| Owner stability | 3.5 | CEO and CFO changes in 2025, a debt buyout and losses, then reported revenue growth and debt elimination in 2026 (vendor) |
| Cost of staying supported | 3 | End of support dates not found; hardware generations P100 and X100 replaced by P200 and X200 |
Technical lock-in: 14.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 3 | Proprietary two-dimensional erasure coding layout; data leaves through S3 or NFS |
| Export path | 1.5 | S3 and NFS reads, bucket replication; no export tooling found |
| Stack coupling | 3 | Own software stack on every node |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 3.5 | Quantum platforms or qualified Supermicro and Cisco servers only; tape tier on LTO libraries |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 3 | Quantum-specific console and tooling; small skills pool |
Integrator fit: 10.0 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Partner programme openness | 2.5 | Service providers such as ASI Solutions and media partners are named; programme terms not found |
| Multi-tenancy and self-service | 3 | Up to 5 million accounts and users and 5 million buckets, IAM domains and groups, CSV import of accounts (limits table) |
| API and infrastructure-as-code | 2.5 | REST API and CLI; no Terraform or Ansible found |
| Skills and certification | 2 | No ActiveScale certification found |
AI leverage: 4.0 / 20
How the product uses AI, scored per year like capability. Only GA counts.
| Criterion | 2019 | 2022 | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI workload support | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 2024: 7.0: Z200 NVMe all-flash nodes; no GPUDirect or S3 over RDMA found |
| AI platform stack | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2015: None |
| AI-assisted operations | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2019: Cloud Based Analytics for monitoring, rule based (introducing year grade C) |
| Agent openness | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2015: S3 and REST management APIs and CLI; no MCP server found |
Year by year: 2015: 2.5 · 2016: 2.5 · 2017: 2.5 · 2018: 2.5 · 2019: 3.5 · 2020: 3.5 · 2021: 3.5 · 2022: 3.5 · 2023: 3.5 · 2024: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2026: 4
AI say-do, 2023 to 2026: 0 AI items announced; 0 GA, 0 still preview, 0 pending, 0 dropped. No AI feature was announced for ActiveScale from 2023 to 2026; AI appears only in positioning and in the CEO's comments on demand.
ActiveScale treats AI as a reason to keep more data: an all-flash tier and a tape-backed cold tier for training sets. There is no GPU data path, no AI in operations beyond rule-based analytics and no agent interface beyond the APIs.
Reading
ActiveScale's strongest domain is lifecycle, built on a Glacier storage class on tape with ranged restore. Its release notes are public and dated, so the 2024 to 2026 steps rest on primary text: Z200 all-flash and IAM in 7.0, IAM conditions and ranged restore in 7.1, admin MFA in 7.2. Security and deployment stay low, with no federation, external KMS or software-only build found. Commercial risk is among the highest in this Ledger because of Quantum's 2025 management and debt changes, even after the reported debt elimination in 2026. A buyer should ask Quantum which Object Lock mode ActiveScale applies and whether legal hold is supported, and read the FY2026 annual report before signing a multi-year contract.
Open questions and items to re-score
- Governance versus compliance mode and legal hold; the View guide names neither.
- Whether Veeam 13 immutability has been tested (the 2025-12 listing says v12 only).
- 7.3.0 release notes and exact date; end of support dates per release.
- Dates of the Amplidata and Western Digital transactions and the release that introduced Object Lock (5.7, search summary).
- Introducing release and year of ActiveScale Cold Storage and of NFS volumes.
- Any going concern language in the FY2026 10-K; price; whether a software-only build exists.
Related reading
More from Object Storage Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Object Storage Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Ceph RGW: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Cloudian HyperStore: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- DataCore Swarm: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Dell ObjectScale: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Everpure FlashBlade: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Hitachi HCP: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- IBM COS on-prem: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- IBM Storage Ceph: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- MinIO AIStor: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- MinIO CE: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- NetApp StorageGRID: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- NooBaa: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Nutanix Objects: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- OpenShift ODF: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Qumulo: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- RustFS: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Scality ARTESCA: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Scality RING: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- SeaweedFS: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- VAST Data: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Versity S3 Gateway: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Zenko CloudServer: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard