IBM COS on-prem: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
IBM COS on-prem keeps Cleversafe's dispersed erasure coding and compliance-mode Object Lock; its recent release record is thin, so it is not ranked.
Where IBM COS put its effort, 2016 to 2026
Each square is one capability area in one year. The brighter it is, the more the area gained in the Object Storage Ledger that year; 1, 2 and 3 mark that year's biggest pushes.
| ’16 | ’17 | ’18 | ’19 | ’20 | ’21 | ’22 | ’23 | ’24 | ’25 | ’26 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 API fidelity | 2 | ||||||||||
| Immutability and compliance | 1 | ||||||||||
| Durability and resilience | |||||||||||
| Performance and scale | |||||||||||
| Deployment freedom | 2 | ||||||||||
| Security and multi-tenancy | 2 | ||||||||||
| Operations | 3 | ||||||||||
| Protocols beyond S3 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Lifecycle and tiering | 1 | ||||||||||
| Ecosystem and openness |
Biggest pushes overall: Immutability and compliance (+3), Protocols beyond S3 (+1), Lifecycle and tiering (+1). Already strong in 2015: Durability and resilience, Performance and scale, Security and multi-tenancy.
Top focus each year: 2019 Protocols beyond S3; 2021 Lifecycle and tiering; 2023 Immutability and compliance. 8 of 11 years show no gain in any area.
Part of the Object Storage Ledger (edition 2026-10-16). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Type: product
- Owner: IBM (listed, USA); Cleversafe acquired by IBM in 2015 (background, grade C); no ownership change since 2023; IBM also sells IBM Storage Ceph for object storage since the Red Hat storage teams joined IBM (target 2023-01-01), and no IBM statement on the future of COS was found
- Licence: Commercial; perpetual, subscription or consumption licences (Redpaper); IBM appliances or IBM-certified x86 servers from IBM, HPE, Seagate, Cisco, Dell, Lenovo and QCT; no on-premises price found (the IBM Cloud service price is a different product)
- Latest release: ClevOS 3.20.0 (documentation published, release date not found; listed on IBM's lifecycle page by 2026-05-19); 3.19.0 and 3.19.1 named in a support alert last modified 2025-02-19
- Support lifecycle: Continuous Delivery model since ClevOS 3.16.0 with a longer-term release option (lifecycle page abstract); end of support dates behind an IBM login
- Next milestone: none published
- Object lock: S3 Object Lock since ClevOS 3.17.2 (2023) in compliance mode only; the release notes state "Governance mode is not supported"; legal hold API calls documented; lock enabled at system level, then per container vault; behaviour in 3.20.0 not read. Veeam Ready Repository (Capacity Target) with immutability on ClevOS 3.17.2.11 and 3.17.5.57 (Veeam article 465, modified 2023-12-05), IAM and STS not supported. The Redpaper lists Spectrum Protect, Commvault, NetBackup, Rubrik, Veeam and Cohesity as validated applications without an Object Lock statement. IBM claims support for SEC 17a-4(f) (vendor); no Cohasset assessment found
- Tier: Appliance or hardware-bound
- Archetype: Slow follower
- Evidence grade: B. The ClevOS 3.17.2 release notes PDF, the Redpaper REDP-5537-02, the 3.20.0 documentation index, the Veeam Ready listing (article 465) and the abstracts of IBM's support lifecycle page (modified 2026-05-19) and a support alert (modified 2025-02-19) were read directly. Release notes for 3.18 to 3.20 were not readable (one 3.18.4 copy on Scribd, undated), so everything after 2023 rests on titles and abstracts; history before 2019 is grade C.
Not ranked: Inclusion test 1 not confirmed: no dated release since 2025-10-15 found (checked 2026-10-16)
Scope of the scores: The on-premises IBM Cloud Object Storage System, sold as IBM appliances or as software on IBM-certified x86 servers. The IBM Cloud service with One-Rate pricing is a separate product and is not scored. The entry is not ranked until a dated ClevOS release since 2025-10-15 is found.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 64.6 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +9.2 points (2015 to 2022: +5.3) | higher is better |
| Credibility | 13.0 / 25 | higher is better |
| Commercial risk | 12.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 14.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Integrator fit | 12.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 2.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 52.4 / 100 | balanced weights; see the methodology |
Capability by domain, 2015 to today
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2015 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S3 API fidelity (15) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 |
| Immutability and compliance (12) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Durability and resilience (12) | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Performance and scale (12) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Deployment freedom (10) | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Security and multi-tenancy (10) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Operations (10) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Protocols beyond S3 (7) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Lifecycle and tiering (7) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Ecosystem and openness (5) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Total / 100 | 50.1 | 52.5 | 55.4 | 64.6 |
Year by year: 2015: 50.1 · 2016: 50.1 · 2017: 50.1 · 2018: 50.1 · 2019: 52.5 · 2020: 52.5 · 2021: 55.4 · 2022: 55.4 · 2023: 64.6 · 2024: 64.6 · 2025: 64.6 · 2026: 64.6
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Deployment freedom | 2.5 → 3 | +1.0 | Redpaper (2019): Accessers as physical, VM, Docker or embedded; Manager as physical, VM or Docker; certified servers from several vendors; no Kubernetes operator, Arm or public cloud option found |
| 2019 | Protocols beyond S3 | 2 → 3 | +1.4 | OpenStack Swift API v1.1 on every Accesser (Redpaper; introducing release not found); SMB and NFS only through a separate virtual machine (vendor) |
| 2021 | Lifecycle and tiering | 1.5 → 2.5 | +1.4 | Object expiration rules (Redpaper revision; release not found); no transition between classes or tiering to another target found for on-premises |
| 2021 | S3 API fidelity | 2.5 → 3 | +1.5 | 3.15.x: container mode with a storage account portal (3.15.4) and S3 versioning in container mode (3.15.7); object expiration; IAM and STS not supported (Veeam); bucket policies and presigned URLs not verified |
| 2023 | Immutability and compliance | 0 → 3 | +7.2 | 3.17.2: S3 Object Lock in compliance mode only with legal hold; Veeam Ready Capacity Target with immutability on 3.17.x; no governance mode, no independent assessment |
| 2023 | Operations | 3 → 3.5 | +1.0 | 3.17.0: Manager database backup to an S3 bucket; Continuous Delivery model since 3.16 with a longer-term option; 3.20.0 adds an OpenTelemetry traces pipeline (date not found); no Terraform found |
| 2023 | Security and multi-tenancy | 3 → 3.5 | +1.0 | 3.17.1: OIDC and MFA for the Manager; account and container model with per-account credentials; STS not supported; external KMS and FIPS not read |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each release item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ClevOS 3.17.0: Manager database backup to an S3 bucket | Operations | C |
| 2023 | ClevOS 3.17.1: OIDC and MFA for the Manager | Security | C |
| 2023 | ClevOS 3.17.2: S3 Object Lock in compliance mode with legal hold | Immutability | C |
| 2023-01 | Red Hat Ceph and ODF teams join IBM, so IBM sells two object platforms: COS and IBM Storage Ceph | Packaging | P |
| 2023-12 | Veeam Ready listing updated with Veeam 12 on ClevOS 3.17.5.57 | Immutability | M |
| 2025 | ClevOS 3.18.4: support for migrating failing disks removed; SSH public key authentication for SFTP log transfer | Operations | C |
| 2025-02 | Support alert on client I/O failing with HTTP 400 after upgrading to 3.18.5.48 or newer, naming 3.19.0 and 3.19.1 | Operations | C |
| 2026 | ClevOS 3.20.0 listed by 2026-05-19 (release date not found): OpenTelemetry traces pipeline | Operations | C |
- Centre of gravity: Operations (4), Immutability (2), Packaging (1)
- Blind spots (no items): S3 API, Durability, Performance, Deployment, Protocols, Lifecycle, Ecosystem, Licensing, AI
- Driver mix: Vision 0%, Customer need 75%, Market window 13%, Upstream 0%, Portfolio 13%
- Idea-to-need index: 0.00 (0 = demand-pulled, 1 = thesis-pushed)
Credibility: 13.0 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 3 | Continuous Delivery model since 3.16 with frequent point releases; release dates are not published |
| Roadmap transparency | 1.5 | Older release notes PDFs are public; current notes, lifecycle dates and alerts sit behind an IBM login; no roadmap |
| Say-do | 3 | No forward announcements for the on-premises product were found to test |
| Velocity | 2.5 | Recent items are observability and removals; the last substantive capability found is Object Lock in 2023 |
| Lifecycle stability | 3 | A defined Continuous Delivery model with a longer-term option; no forced migration seen |
Commercial risk: 12.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Price and licence volatility | 2 | Perpetual, subscription and consumption options; no change found, and no public prices |
| Purchase constraints | 2.5 | Several licence models and a choice of certified hardware vendors; quote only |
| Channel and access | 3 | IBM direct and Business Partners; lifecycle dates, alerts and current notes need an IBM login |
| Owner stability | 2 | Large listed owner since 2015; IBM now also sells IBM Storage Ceph for object, and no statement on the future of COS was found |
| Cost of staying supported | 2.5 | End of support dates not readable; Continuous Delivery model asks for regular upgrades |
Technical lock-in: 14.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 4 | Encrypted, dispersed slices that are readable only through the system |
| Export path | 1.5 | S3 reads and S3 proxy and migration features in vault mode |
| Stack coupling | 3 | Own Manager, Accesser and Slicestor stack |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 2.5 | IBM appliances or certified x86 servers from several vendors; runs on-premises |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 3 | IBM-specific Manager, Accesser and Slicestor skills |
Integrator fit: 12.5 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Partner programme openness | 3 | IBM Business Partner programme; terms for COS not read |
| Multi-tenancy and self-service | 4 | Container mode scales to millions of containers and users, with a storage account portal, a Service API and usage reports in CSV, JSON or XML (Redpaper) |
| API and infrastructure-as-code | 3 | S3, Service API and Manager REST API; no Terraform or Ansible found |
| Skills and certification | 2.5 | No COS certification track verified |
AI leverage: 2.5 / 20
How the product uses AI, scored per year like capability. Only GA counts.
| Criterion | 2019 | 2022 | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI workload support | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2015: Capacity tier for analytics and backup; nothing AI-specific |
| AI platform stack | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2015: None; "data lake for AI" is product page wording only |
| AI-assisted operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2015: None found |
| Agent openness | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2015: S3, Service API and Manager REST API; no MCP server found |
Year by year: 2015: 2.5 · 2016: 2.5 · 2017: 2.5 · 2018: 2.5 · 2019: 2.5 · 2020: 2.5 · 2021: 2.5 · 2022: 2.5 · 2023: 2.5 · 2024: 2.5 · 2025: 2.5 · 2026: 2.5
AI say-do, 2023 to 2026: 0 AI items announced; 0 GA, 0 still preview, 0 pending, 0 dropped. No AI item for the on-premises product was found for 2023 to 2026; IBM points AI buyers to IBM Storage Scale and Ceph.
IBM COS on-premises has no AI feature on record. Its AI role is a capacity tier behind the APIs, while IBM's AI storage story runs through other products.
Reading
IBM COS keeps the durability design Cleversafe built: objects are encrypted and dispersed as slices across nodes and sites, so no single node holds all the data, and that earns a 4.5. The rest of the record is thin for 2024 to 2026, because current release notes are not public and the newest items found are an observability feature and removals. Object Lock covers compliance mode only, and the only Veeam test is on ClevOS 3.17. A buyer should ask IBM for the 3.19 and 3.20 release dates, the Object Lock modes in 3.20, and whether new object deployments are being steered to IBM Storage Ceph.
Open questions and items to re-score
- ClevOS 3.19.0 and 3.20.0 release dates, needed to rank the product (inclusion test 1).
- Object Lock behaviour in 3.20.0: whether governance mode was added after 3.17.2.
- End of support dates per version on the login-gated lifecycle page.
- S3 feature matrix: bucket policies, presigned URLs, SSE-C, lifecycle transitions.
- A Veeam listing for a newer ClevOS release and for Veeam 13.
- External KMS and FIPS validation status.
- Release that introduced the Swift API and object expiration (2019 and 2021 steps, grade C).
- Price, and whether IBM steers new object buyers to IBM Storage Ceph.
Related reading
More from Object Storage Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Object Storage Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Ceph RGW: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Cloudian HyperStore: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- DataCore Swarm: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Dell ObjectScale: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Everpure FlashBlade: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Hitachi HCP: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- IBM Storage Ceph: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- MinIO AIStor: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- MinIO CE: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- NetApp StorageGRID: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- NooBaa: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Nutanix Objects: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- OpenShift ODF: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Quantum ActiveScale: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Qumulo: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- RustFS: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Scality ARTESCA: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Scality RING: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- SeaweedFS: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- VAST Data: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Versity S3 Gateway: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard
- Zenko CloudServer: Object Storage Ledger 2026 Scorecard