Object Storage Ledger · edition

Object Storage Ledger 2026: 23 Products Scored

Where each object storage product stands, and where it is heading. Scored on what shipped. The overview puts every angle and an overall index in one place; the map below compares any two scores. Click a product anywhere for its full scorecard.

The Object Storage Ledger scores 23 s3-compatible object storage products (21 ranked) on capability, credibility, buyer risk, lock-in and AI, using public release records only (edition 2026-10-16). Top 5 by Ledger Index out of 100: Ceph RGW (66.3), MinIO AIStor (64.1), IBM Storage Ceph (62.9), SeaweedFS (61.6), StorageGRID (61.3). The full table is below; each name links to its scorecard, and the methodology explains every score.

2026
Compare: pick up to 8 for All angles, the trend chart and the map arrows

Ledger overview

Capability
Ledger Index
Capability trend, 2015 to 2026

Map view

How to read this map
  • Each point is one product today. Its label shows the name, then its two scores, e.g. "Cap 69.5 · Cred 18" means capability 69.5 and credibility 18.
  • Up and right is better on every view. Risk axes are drawn upside down for that reason: low risk sits at the top.
  • The shaded corner is above the halfway mark on both axes; the dashed lines are those halfway marks.
  • Arrows show how far a product moved since the end of 2022. Only capability and AI are scored per year, so arrows only move along those axes; the other scores describe the 2023 to 2026 record.
  • Colour and shape show what mostly drives the vendor's roadmap. Entries marked not ranked fail an inclusion test; their scores are for reference only.
  • Arrows appear for the products picked in Compare. Hover any point for its numbers, or click it for the full scorecard.

All scores

Object Storage Ledger 2026: 23 Products Scored: ranking by Ledger Index (risk and lock-in: lower is better)
#NameLedger Index /100Capability /100Credibility /25Commercial risk /25Lock-in /25AI /20Archetype
1Ceph RADOS Gateway (RGW, upstream)66.381.518.593.5Dependable builder
2MinIO AIStor64.178.6161647.5Real innovator, portfolio-gated
3IBM Storage Ceph (formerly Red Hat Ceph Storage)62.981.216.511.510.53Dependable builder
4SeaweedFS (open source and Enterprise Edition)61.669.316875Dependable builder, open core
5NetApp StorageGRID61.37415.511115.5Dependable builder
6Cloudian HyperStore607713.512.5116.5Real innovator, thinly documented
7Versity S3 Gateway (VersityGW)59.656.61633Dependable builder, young
8VAST Data Platform59.568.21614.5148.5Real innovator, many items pending
9Dell ObjectScale (formerly ECS)59.171.914.513137Dependable builder, thinly documented
10Everpure FlashBlade (formerly Pure Storage, Purity//FB)58.963161214.57Dependable builder, hardware-bound
11NooBaa (Multicloud Object Gateway engine)58.558.2166.53Dependable builder, inside ODF
12Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation (RGW and the Multicloud Object Gateway)58.268.11613.5124Dependable builder, OpenShift-bound
13Nutanix Objects (Nutanix Unified Storage)57.763.916.512.513.56.5Dependable builder
14Scality RING57.471.913.51311.58Vision-led, thinly documented
15RustFS56.459.614.510.564Sharp opportunist, young product
16Hitachi Content Platform and VSP One Object54.76713.515145Integrated stack
17Qumulo Core S3 API54.458.515.51411.55.5Sharp opportunist
18Scality ARTESCA54.362.514.512.5112.5Sharp opportunist
19Quantum ActiveScale51.66214.515144Dependable builder
20DataCore Swarm (formerly Caringo)5059.81412112.5Sharp opportunist
21Zenko CloudServer (Scality open-source S3 server)49.946.615.54.52Dependable builder, maintenance-led

Capability /100. Ten domains scored 0 to 5 against fixed anchors, weighted to 100. The buyer lens changes the weights, not the domain scores. History from 2015 uses the same anchors, so a line rises only when something ships.

Credibility /25. Cadence, roadmap transparency, say-do record, velocity and lifecycle stability, from the 2023 to 2026 release record.

Commercial risk and technical lock-in /25 each. Lower is better, so these axes are drawn reversed. Buyer risk is the two added together, out of 50.

AI leverage /20. Four strands scored per year: AI workload infrastructure, AI platform stack, AI-assisted operations and agent openness. Only GA counts; previews count half a step at most.

Ledger Index /100. A weighted blend of all parts, always shown with them. Before 2023 only capability and AI move; the other parts are held at today's values.

Idea-to-need index. Share of vision-led items among vision, customer and market-window items. 0 means demand-pulled, 1 means thesis-pushed. It is a direction, not a grade.