Mr.PlanB Logo
    Enterprise Linux Ledger 2026
    Ledger
    Enterprise Linux Ledger 2026

    Rocky Linux: Enterprise Linux Ledger 2026 Scorecard

    Rocky Linux rebuilds RHEL within weeks and adds little of its own, with one commercial backer and a foundation that says it relies on a few people.

    Edition October 16, 20267 min read

    Where Rocky Linux put its effort, 2022 to 2026

    Each square is one capability area in one year. The brighter it is, the more the area gained in the Enterprise Linux Ledger that year; 1, 2 and 3 mark that year's biggest pushes.

    ’22’23’24’25’26
    Lifecycle and upgrades
    Security and compliance2
    Hardware and architectures1
    Virtualization and cloud images3
    Containers and Kubernetes host
    Software currency and packaging
    Fleet management and automation
    Storage and filesystems
    Enterprise integration and certifications
    AI and GPU readiness1
    no change+0.5+1+1.5 or moreScores out of 5 per area.

    Biggest pushes overall: AI and GPU readiness (+1), Security and compliance (+0.5), Hardware and architectures (+0.5). Already strong in 2021: Software currency and packaging, Storage and filesystems, Lifecycle and upgrades.

    Top focus each year: 2025 Hardware and architectures; 2026 AI and GPU readiness. 3 of 5 years show no gain in any area.

    Part of the Enterprise Linux Ledger (edition 2026-10-16). How the scores work: methodology.

    Snapshot

    • Type: community project with commercial editions from CIQ
    • Owner: Rocky Enterprise Software Foundation (RESF), chaired by Gregory Kurtzer, who is also CEO of CIQ, the main commercial backer
    • Licence: Free, open-source licences, no subscription; CIQ sells Rocky Linux from CIQ (RLC+, RLC Pro, RLC Pro Hardened, RLC Pro AI), prices not published
    • Latest release: 10.2 (2026-05-28) and 9.8 (2026-05-27); 10.0 shipped 2025-06-11, three weeks after RHEL 10.0
    • Support lifecycle: Follows RHEL majors; minor releases are not maintained once the next minor ships; no in-place major upgrade (fresh install recommended)
    • Next milestone: None published; minors follow RHEL by one to three weeks; Infrastructure v2 and the Secure Boot certificate transition are in progress
    • Support window: 10 years per major with no extension from the project: Rocky 8 to 2029-05-31, 9 to 2032-05-31, 10 to 2035-05-31 (endoflife.date; CIQ states a 10-year RLC Pro lifecycle)
    • Tier: RHEL rebuild
    • Archetype: Rebuild with one backer
    • Evidence grade: B. Release posts, the 10.2 release notes, the security repository and State of the Foundation posts, the RESF and CIQ pages and the 2023 sourcing statement were read from primary sources. Major end dates come from endoflife.date; CIQ edition features are vendor claims; the 2021 architecture baseline is background knowledge.

    Scorecard

    DimensionScoreDirection
    Capability today68.5 / 100higher is better
    Momentum since end of 2022+6.5 points (2021 to 2022: +0.0)higher is better
    Credibility16.0 / 25higher is better
    Sustainability risk12.5 / 25lower is better
    Technical lock-in2.0 / 25lower is better
    Integrator fit9.0 / 20higher is better
    AI leverage4.0 / 20higher is better
    Ledger Index59.1 / 100balanced weights; see the methodology

    Capability by domain, 2015 to today

    Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.

    Domain (weight)201520192022Today
    Lifecycle and upgrades (15)n/an/a3.53.5
    Security and compliance (15)n/an/a33.5
    Hardware and architectures (10)n/an/a3.54
    Virtualization and cloud images (10)n/an/a3.54
    Containers and Kubernetes host (10)n/an/a3.54
    Software currency and packaging (10)n/an/a44
    Fleet management and automation (10)n/an/a22
    Storage and filesystems (5)n/an/a44
    Enterprise integration and certifications (5)n/an/a2.52.5
    AI and GPU readiness (10)n/an/a1.52.5
    Total / 100n/an/a62.068.5

    Year by year: 2021: 62.0 · 2022: 62.0 · 2023: 62.0 · 2024: 62.0 · 2025: 63.0 · 2026: 68.5

    What moved the score

    YearDomainChangePointsTrigger
    2025Hardware and architectures3.5 → 4+1.010.1: development board images; RISC-V support announced 2025-05-21 (preview)
    2026AI and GPU readiness1.5 → 2.5+2.0CIQ RLC+ with integrated NVIDIA and AMD drivers (vendor claim, launch date not published; half credit)
    2026Containers and Kubernetes host3.5 → 4+1.010.2: bootable container images from image builder
    2026Security and compliance3 → 3.5+1.5Security repository (2026-05-14) ships urgent fixes before upstream; ML-KEM key exchange in 10.2
    2026Virtualization and cloud images3.5 → 4+1.010.2: image builder outputs bootable container images, disk images and stateless PXE images

    Direction, 2023 to 2026

    Each release item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).

    DateItemThemeDriver
    2023-06Sourcing statement: RHEL code via UBI images, pay-per-use cloud instances and CentOS Stream; Red Hat's terms rejectedLicensingM
    2024-058.10: final Rocky 8 minorLifecycleU
    2025-05RISC-V support announcedHardwareV
    2025-0610.0 GA three weeks after RHEL 10.0, with the x86-64-v3 baselineLifecycleU
    2025-1110.1 with development board imagesHardwareC
    2026-05Opt-in security repository for urgent fixes ahead of upstream (CopyFail, Dirty Frag)SecurityC
    2026-0510.2: ML-KEM in OpenSSH and libssh; image builder bootable container and PXE outputsVirtualization and cloudU
    2026-06Secure Boot CA and KEK transition plan with dual-signed shimsSecurityU
    2026-06State of the Foundation: leadership restructure, Infrastructure v2, own hardware replaces donated serversGovernanceC
    2026-10CIQ lists RLC Pro AI with CUDA, PyTorch and vLLM (observed; launch date not published)AIV
    • Centre of gravity: Lifecycle (2), Hardware (2), Security (2)
    • Blind spots (no items): Containers, Packaging, Fleet management, Storage, Enterprise integration
    • Driver mix: Vision 20%, Customer need 30%, Market window 10%, Upstream 40%, Portfolio 0%
    • Idea-to-need index: 0.33 (0 = demand-pulled, 1 = thesis-pushed)

    Credibility: 16.0 / 25

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Cadence4Minors follow RHEL by one to three weeks (10.0 after 22 days, 10.2 after 9 days); rhythm kept, not published
    Roadmap transparency3News posts and open build tooling; no written roadmap
    Say-do3Security repository and 10.x shipped; RISC-V images announced in May 2025 without a verified GA; Infrastructure v2 pending
    Velocity2.5Each release carries RHEL's changes; the project's own additions are small (security repository, board images)
    Lifecycle stability3.5Ten-year majors, but no in-place major upgrade and minors unsupported once the next ships

    Sustainability risk: 12.5 / 25 (lower is better)

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Maintainer concentration3.5The 2026-06-10 letter names reliance on a few people and slow onboarding; CIQ is the dominant backer
    Backer health2.5CIQ is private with no published finances; AWS, Google Cloud and Arm listed as sponsors
    Licence-change risk3Depends on RHEL sources taken through UBI, cloud instances and CentOS Stream; Red Hat's 2023 terms are contested
    Abandonment signs1.5Releases within weeks of RHEL through 2026; infrastructure being rehoused from donated Equinix hardware
    Security response2Project errata plus the 2026 opt-in security repository for urgent fixes; CVE response times not published

    Technical lock-in: 2.0 / 25 (lower is better)

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Formats0.5RPM, qcow2, OCI; identical to RHEL
    Export path0.5migrate2rocky converts in; moving to RHEL or another rebuild is a scripted switch or reinstall
    Stack coupling0No management stack required
    Hardware / cloud coupling0.5Any x86-64-v3 or arm64 server; images on the four large clouds
    Skills and tooling coupling0.5RHEL skills transfer one to one

    Integrator fit: 9.0 / 20

    CriterionScoreBasis
    Partner programme openness3CIQ partner programme (terms not read); the community side is open
    Multi-tenancy and self-service0.5No management product in the community edition
    API and infrastructure-as-code2.5Standard EL tooling: Ansible, community Terraform, web console API
    Skills and certification3RHEL certifications apply in practice; no certification of its own

    AI leverage: 4.0 / 20

    How the product uses AI, scored per year like capability. Only GA counts.

    Criterion20192022TodayLatest step
    AI workload supportn/a122026: CIQ RLC+ ships NVIDIA and AMD data centre drivers integrated (vendor claim, undated)
    AI platform stackn/a012026: CIQ RLC Pro AI listed with CUDA, PyTorch and vLLM; availability not verified
    AI-assisted operationsn/a002021: None
    Agent opennessn/a112021: Web console API and Ansible; no agent interface

    Year by year: 2021: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2026: 4

    AI say-do, 2023 to 2026: 1 AI items announced; 0 GA, 0 still preview, 1 pending, 0 dropped. The one AI item is CIQ's RLC Pro AI, listed as a product with no launch date found.

    The community edition carries no AI content of its own; GPU users install NVIDIA's repositories as on any EL system. CIQ's GPU-ready and AI editions are vendor claims without a verified launch date, so they count at half.

    Reading

    Rocky Linux delivers RHEL's capability for free within weeks of each release, which is why its capability line tracks RHEL's minus the vendor services. Its own additions are modest: a security repository, board images and a RISC-V announcement. The risk is organisational rather than technical: one commercial backer, a founder who chairs both the foundation and that backer, a sourcing model that depends on Red Hat's tolerance, and a 2026 letter that admits key-person reliance. A buyer should check whether the CIQ edition or a third-party contract covers the compliance items the community edition lacks.

    Open questions and items to re-score

    • RISC-V general availability not verified; development board images shipped with 10.1.
    • CIQ RLC+, RLC Pro Hardened and RLC Pro AI: launch dates, prices and FIPS 140-3 certificates are vendor claims; the AI step counts at half.
    • Architectures at the 2021 start (ppc64le and s390x arrived later) rest on background knowledge, grade C.
    • Whether Red Hat enforces its subscription terms against sources taken from cloud instances and UBI images.
    • RESF legal form and CIQ finances are not published.
    • Infrastructure v2 and the dual-signed shim for the Secure Boot certificate change are pending.

    Related reading

    More from Enterprise Linux Ledger 2026