Enterprise Linux Ledger · edition

Enterprise Linux Ledger 2026: 16 Distributions Scored

Where each enterprise Linux distribution stands, and where it is heading. Scored on what shipped. The overview puts every angle and an overall index in one place; the map below compares any two scores. Click a distribution anywhere for its full scorecard.

The Enterprise Linux Ledger scores 16 enterprise linux distributions on capability, credibility, buyer risk, lock-in and AI, using public release records only (edition 2026-10-16). Top 5 by Ledger Index out of 100: RHEL (77.8), Ubuntu (75.7), SLES (69.8), AlmaLinux (63.7), Oracle Linux (63.6). The full table is below; each name links to its scorecard, and the methodology explains every score.

2026
Compare: pick up to 8 for All angles, the trend chart and the map arrows

Ledger overview

Capability
Ledger Index
Capability trend, 2015 to 2026

Map view

How to read this map
  • Each point is one distribution today. Its label shows the name, then its two scores, e.g. "Cap 69.5 · Cred 18" means capability 69.5 and credibility 18.
  • Up and right is better on every view. Risk axes are drawn upside down for that reason: low risk sits at the top.
  • The shaded corner is above the halfway mark on both axes; the dashed lines are those halfway marks.
  • Arrows show how far a distribution moved since the end of 2022. Only capability and AI are scored per year, so arrows only move along those axes; the other scores describe the 2023 to 2026 record.
  • Colour and shape show what mostly drives the vendor's roadmap. Entries marked not ranked fail an inclusion test; their scores are for reference only.
  • Arrows appear for the distributions picked in Compare. Hover any point for its numbers, or click it for the full scorecard.

All scores

Enterprise Linux Ledger 2026: 16 Distributions Scored: ranking by Ledger Index (risk and lock-in: lower is better)
#NameLedger Index /100Capability /100Credibility /25Commercial risk /25Lock-in /25AI /20Archetype
1Red Hat Enterprise Linux77.889.520.513411.5Real innovator
2Ubuntu Server with Ubuntu Pro75.78521.5836.5Calendar-driven builder
3SUSE Linux Enterprise Server69.882191267Dependable builder
4AlmaLinux OS63.771.5199.523Dependable builder
5Oracle Linux63.673.516.56.553Long-window upstream packager
6Debian61.46619522Volunteer upstream base
7Rocky Linux (RESF, with Rocky Linux from CIQ)59.168.51612.524Rebuild with one backer
8Amazon Linux 202358.76317684Integrated stack, one cloud
9Flatcar Container Linux58.56518.59.553Dependable builder with one sponsor
10Bottlerocket57.262.517.55114.5Kubernetes-paced upstream rider
11openSUSE Leap56.96316.5942Community twin of SLES
12Azure Linux (formerly CBL-Mariner)56.252.5167.510.53.5Integrated stack inside AKS
13openEuler (OpenAtom Foundation)55.755.515.59.5910.5Sponsor-aligned builder
14CentOS Stream49.35515142.52Vendor-run upstream
15CloudLinux OS48.346.51497.51Dependable builder
16Anolis OS (OpenAnolis)4650131192.5Sponsor-led innovator

Capability /100. Ten domains scored 0 to 5 against fixed anchors, weighted to 100. The buyer lens changes the weights, not the domain scores. History from 2015 uses the same anchors, so a line rises only when something ships.

Credibility /25. Cadence, roadmap transparency, say-do record, velocity and lifecycle stability, from the 2023 to 2026 release record.

Commercial risk and technical lock-in /25 each. Lower is better, so these axes are drawn reversed. Buyer risk is the two added together, out of 50.

AI leverage /20. Four strands scored per year: AI workload infrastructure, AI platform stack, AI-assisted operations and agent openness. Only GA counts; previews count half a step at most.

Ledger Index /100. A weighted blend of all parts, always shown with them. Before 2023 only capability and AI move; the other parts are held at today's values.

Idea-to-need index. Share of vision-led items among vision, customer and market-window items. 0 means demand-pulled, 1 means thesis-pushed. It is a direction, not a grade.