Zabbix: Monitoring Ledger 2026
Zabbix has the most transparent record here, with a public roadmap, regular LTS releases and strong scale; buyers add flow, config backup and topology.
Part of the Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger (edition 2026-10-04). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Tier: Leader incumbent
- Owner: Zabbix SIA / Zabbix LLC, founder-owned (Alexei Vladishev) since 2005, no venture capital or private equity
- Licence model: AGPLv3 since 7.0 (GPLv2 before), no open-core split; paid support tiers Silver to Global, training and Zabbix Cloud
- Products scored: Zabbix 7.4 (with 7.0 LTS) open-source server, proxies, agents and frontend; 8.0 LTS RC1 counted half at most
- Latest release: Zabbix 7.4.0, 2025-06-30, with 7.0 LTS maintained; 8.0.0rc1 tagged 2026-10-01
- Next signal: 8.0 LTS GA in October 2026 (MCP server, OpenTelemetry tracing, event console); 8.2 in March 2027 with NetFlow, topology and log management
- Archetype: Open-source workhorse, public roadmap
- Evidence grade: A. Release notes, public roadmap, git tags and registries read directly; the date of the first official Proxmox and Nutanix templates is not given.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 83.4 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +8.0 points | higher is better |
| Credibility | 23.5 / 25 | higher is better |
| Commercial risk | 3.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 4.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Integrator fit | 15.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 9.0 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 79.4 / 100 | balanced weights |
Capability by domain
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2016 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server, virtualization and storage (12) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Network monitoring (12) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Application and service monitoring (10) | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 |
| Data collection and scale (12) | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 5 |
| Alerting and event management (12) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Visualisation and reporting (8) | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 |
| Logs and traces (8) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Automation and remediation (8) | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Security and compliance (8) | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4.5 |
| New-platform support (VMware exit) (10) | 1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| Total / 100 | 62.8 | 66.4 | 75.4 | 83.4 |
Year by year: 2016: 62.8 · 2017: 62.8 · 2018: 62.8 · 2019: 66.4 · 2020: 67.2 · 2021: 67.2 · 2022: 75.4 · 2023: 75.4 · 2024: 78.6 · 2025: 78.6 · 2026: 83.4
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Application and service monitoring | 3 → 3.5 | +1.0 | 4.0/4.4: HTTP agent, Agent 2 database plugins, Prometheus endpoint scraping |
| 2019 | Automation and remediation | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | 4.4: JavaScript webhooks for two-way ServiceNow, Jira and Zendesk tickets |
| 2019 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 1 → 1.5 | +1.0 | 4.4: Docker via Agent 2, AWS templates; no Proxmox, AHV or Kubernetes |
| 2019 | Visualisation and reporting | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | 3.4/4.4: grid dashboards with widgets; kiosk mode for NOC walls |
| 2020 | Security and compliance | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | 5.0/5.2: SAML SSO, HashiCorp Vault secrets, granular user roles |
| 2022 | Application and service monitoring | 3.5 → 4 | +1.0 | 6.0: business service trees with SLA and error budgets |
| 2022 | Data collection and scale | 4 → 4.5 | +1.2 | 6.0: native server HA cluster; TimescaleDB storage; 100,000+ values per second |
| 2022 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 1.5 → 2.5 | +2.0 | 6.0: Kubernetes and AWS, Azure, GCP templates; Proxmox only via community templates |
| 2022 | Security and compliance | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | 6.0/6.2: CyberArk vault, audit log, bcrypt; 2022 KEV flaws fall outside the 2023-2026 window |
| 2022 | Server, virtualization and storage | 3.5 → 4.5 | +2.4 | 6.0/6.2: Kubernetes templates, Redfish for iDRAC and iLO, Ceph, NetApp and Pure templates |
| 2022 | Visualisation and reporting | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | 5.4/6.0: multi-page dashboards, scheduled PDF reports, geomap; maps still drawn by hand |
| 2024 | Data collection and scale | 4.5 → 5 | +1.2 | 7.0: proxy groups with failover and load balancing; asynchronous multi-threaded pollers |
| 2024 | Network monitoring | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | 7.0: asynchronous SNMP and parallel discovery; SD-WAN templates; flow and NCM still external |
| 2024 | Security and compliance | 4 → 4.5 | +0.8 | 7.0: native MFA with TOTP and Duo, JIT provisioning; no FIPS build documented |
| 2026 | Logs and traces | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | 6.4/7.0 streaming to Kafka; OpenTelemetry trace intake only in 8.0 RC1, half a step |
| 2026 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 2.5 → 4.5 | +4.0 | By 7.4: official Proxmox VE and Nutanix Prism templates, OpenStack, OCI; no XCP-ng or KubeVirt |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03 | 6.4: cause and symptom problems; Kafka streaming; JIT user provisioning | D5 Alerting and events | C |
| 2024-04 | AGPLv3 licence announced for 7.0 | D12 Packaging and licensing | V |
| 2024-06 | 7.0 LTS: proxy groups with HA and load balancing; asynchronous pollers | D4 Collection and scale | C |
| 2024-06 | 7.0: GPU plugins for NVIDIA DCGM and AMD ROCm | D1 Server and virtualization | M |
| 2024-06 | 7.0: LLM alert summaries via OpenAI and Ollama webhooks | D7 AI-assisted operations | V |
| 2024-06 | 7.0: native MFA with TOTP and Duo | D9 Security | C |
| 2024-06 | 7.0: synthetic browser monitoring | D3 Applications and services | C |
| 2024-10 | Zabbix Cloud managed SaaS launched | D12 Packaging and licensing | P |
| 2025-01 | 7.2: environment variables in configuration files | D10 Automation and remediation | C |
| 2025-06 | 7.4: nested discovery, OAuth 2.0, host wizard | D1 Server and virtualization | C |
| 2025-10 | Acquires IZI-IT to form Zabbix France; Zabbix Academy | D11 Ecosystem openness | P |
| 2026-10 | 8.0 RC1: OpenTelemetry tracing intake and event console | D8 Logs and traces | M |
| 2026-10 | 8.0 RC1: official MCP server for AI agents | D7 AI-assisted operations | V |
- Centre of gravity: Packaging and licensing (2), Server and virtualization (2), AI-assisted operations (2)
- Driver mix: Vision 23%, Customer need 46%, Market window 15%, Upstream 0%, Portfolio 15%
Credibility: 23.5 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 5 | LTS every 18 to 24 months and point releases every six months, per published policy |
| Roadmap transparency | 5 | Written public roadmap to 9.0 with ZBXNEXT issues in an open tracker |
| Say-do | 4.5 | 15 of 17 items due by now shipped on time; NetFlow and topology slipped to 8.2 |
| Velocity | 4.5 | Several substantive features per release, e.g. proxy groups, browser checks, MFA in 7.0 |
| Lifecycle stability | 4.5 | Published LTS policy with long support and in-place upgrades; Oracle backend deprecated |
Say-do record, 2023 to 2026: 23 items 2023-2026: 15 shipped on time, 5 in 8.0 RC1 and on track, 2 slipped (NetFlow ZBXNEXT-37 by about 2.5 years, L2/L3 topology by six months), 1 pending for 8.4, none dropped.
Commercial risk: 3.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Price and licence volatility | 1.5 | Licence moved from GPLv2 to AGPLv3 with 7.0 in 2024; no feature gating |
| Purchase constraints | 0.5 | Software free; support optional, per server and proxy, five tiers |
| Channel and access | 0 | Open downloads, docs, roadmap and partner programme |
| Owner stability | 0.5 | Founder-owned for 20 years; small acquisition of IZI-IT in 2025 |
| Cost of staying supported | 0.5 | Free updates and LTS; support prices quote-based |
Security record of the product itself: CVE-2022-23131 and CVE-2022-23134 (frontend SAML bypass and setup RCE) were added to KEV on 2022-02-22, outside the 2023-2026 window, so no deduction; both were fixed in 5.4.9 about 41 to 62 days before listing (the security record). No KEV entries 2023-2026.
Technical lock-in: 4.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 0.5 | Documented SQL schema; templates and config in public JSON, YAML and XML |
| Export path | 1 | Full API including history.get, streaming connectors; no import tools into other products |
| Stack coupling | 1 | PostgreSQL, TimescaleDB or MySQL; own open agents plus SNMP, IPMI, JMX, Prometheus intake |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 0 | Packages, containers and appliances on any hardware; air-gapped capable |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 1.5 | Zabbix trigger and template skills are product-specific but widespread |
Integrator fit: 15.5 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Partner programme openness | 4.5 | Open partner programme from Certified to Global tier, with regional subsidiaries |
| Multi-tenancy and self-service | 2.5 | Host groups, user roles and per-tenant proxies; no MSP portal or billing |
| API and infrastructure-as-code | 4 | Full JSON-RPC API; community.zabbix Ansible collection with 16.5M downloads; community Terraform provider |
| Skills and certification | 4.5 | ZCU, ZCS, ZCP and ZCE certifications plus Zabbix Academy since 2025 |
AI leverage: 9.0 / 20
| Strand | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|
| AIOps on monitoring data | 2.5 | 2024: 7.0: Agent 2 plugins for NVIDIA DCGM and AMD ROCm GPU metrics |
| AI platform stack | 1 | 2024: 7.0: webhook integrations sending alerts to OpenAI, Azure OpenAI or local Ollama |
| AI-assisted operations | 2.5 | 2024: 7.0: LLM-written alert summaries delivered by webhook; no in-product assistant |
| Agent openness | 3 | 2026: 8.0 RC1: official MCP server, GA due October 2026 |
AI say-do: 2 announced, 2 GA (GPU plugins, LLM webhooks), 0 preview, 0 pending, 0 dropped; the official MCP server is in 8.0 RC1. The AI is statistical trigger functions plus LLM summaries by webhook.
Reading
Zabbix is extending a fully open-source monitoring core toward tracing, event processing and AI agent access in 8.0, with flow and topology to follow in 2027. Its record is the most transparent here: a public roadmap, regular LTS releases, strong scale and HA, and few slips. The gap a buyer must fill is network depth, since flow analysis, configuration backup and automatic topology still need other tools.
Open questions and evidence caveats
- The 8.0 features (MCP, OpenTelemetry, event console) are RC1 at the cutoff and count half a step at most.
- The first release with official Proxmox and Nutanix templates is not dated in the research.
- Scale figures are vendor statements; the millions-per-second target belongs to 8.0.
- NetFlow has slipped from a 2024 target to March 2027.
Related reading
More from Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Broadcom DX NetOps and DX UIM: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Centreon: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Checkmk: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Elastic Observability: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Grafana Labs self-hosted stack: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- IBM SevOne / Netcool: Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Icinga: Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- LibreNMS: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- ManageEngine OpManager Nexus: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Microsoft System Center Operations Manager: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Nagios XI: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Netdata Agent with self-hosted Parents: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- OpenNMS Horizon and Meridian: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Opsview Monitor: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Progress WhatsUp Gold: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Prometheus: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- PRTG: Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- ScienceLogic Skylar One: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- SolarWinds Observability Self-Hosted: Monitoring Ledger 2026