Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026: 20 Platforms Scored
Twenty self-hostable monitoring platforms scored on capability since 2016, credibility, risk, lock-in and AI, from public records only.
Reports in this series
How the Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger scores 20 platforms: fixed anchors, public evidence only, a product security record, one scale for all licences.
Broadcom DX NetOps and DX UIM are the deepest high-end suite here, with topology root cause at huge scale, but deals are subscription-only, high minimums.
Centreon is a European open-core platform shipping twice a year on schedule, with low lock-in and strong VMware-exit coverage but no flow or log analysis.
Checkmk has the cleanest delivery record here and Proxmox monitoring since 2021, but flow analysis still leans on ntopng and config backup is missing.
Elastic brings search, logs and machine learning to monitoring with a strong delivery record, but network-device and hypervisor depth remain thin.
Grafana Labs offers a full self-hosted observability stack with the best release record here, but lacks network management and topology root cause.
IBM folds Netcool and AIOps into Concert Operate on OpenShift, strong on network scale and on-time delivery, but heavy, quote-only and without Proxmox.
Icinga builds a modular, fully GPL stack with a steady, honest record, but graphs, logs, flows and network config live in other tools buyers must run.
LibreNMS is a volunteer-run GPLv3 network monitor with monthly releases and almost no lock-in, but no company, little funding and thin server depth.
ManageEngine is folding OpManager and its sister modules into one Nexus suite with local and cloud LLM features on top.
Microsoft keeps SCOM as a long-supported on-premises engine for Windows estates while steering new monitoring to Azure Monitor and Arc.
Nagios XI is modernising around Nagios Core with Proxmox and XCP-ng wizards and easy exit, but most releases are incremental and there is no ML.
Netdata gives per-second, zero-config monitoring with ML on every metric and strong Proxmox coverage, but network, logs and multi-tenancy are thin.
OpenNMS offers deep free network, event and scale capability and delivered every 2023-2026 promise, but release pace slowed and it needs specialist skills.
Opsview, rebuilt by ITRS on microservices, adds Proxmox, AHV and AI hooks with mostly on-time releases, and is strong on business views and multi-tenancy.
WhatsUp Gold is a mature Windows-based network monitor with perpetual licences, but releases are incremental and 2024 brought two exploited flaws.
Prometheus is the metrics engine much of the market builds on, delivering on target with no owner who could change the licence, but it is not a full suite.
Paessler is modernising PRTG around v2 sensors, cross-platform probes and acquired topology and configuration tools, while extending into OT.
ScienceLogic Skylar One is one of the broadest AIOps platforms here and ships on schedule, but it had an exploited zero-day in 2024 and forces OS upgrades.
SolarWinds is turning its Orion estate into a subscription self-hosted observability suite with an AI agent and incident response on top.
Zabbix has the most transparent record here, with a public roadmap, regular LTS releases and strong scale; buyers add flow, config backup and topology.
Part of the Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger (edition 2026-10-04). How the scores work: methodology. Each vendor links to its own report.
Ranked vendors, by Ledger Index
| Vendor | Tier | Capability /100 | Momentum | Credibility /25 | Commercial risk /25 (lower better) | Lock-in /25 (lower better) | Integrator fit /20 | AI /20 | Ledger Index | Archetype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zabbix (server, proxy, Agent 1 and Agent 2, web frontend) | Leader incumbent | 83.4 | +8.0 | 23.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 15.5 | 9.0 | 79.4 | Open-source workhorse, public roadmap |
| Grafana Labs self-hosted stack (Grafana Enterprise, Mimir, Loki, Tempo, Alloy) | Challenger | 77.8 | +10.2 | 22.0 | 9.5 | 5.5 | 15.0 | 13.0 | 75.4 | Composable observability stack |
| ManageEngine OpManager Nexus (formerly OpManager Plus) with Applications Manager, NetFlow Analyzer, NCM and OpManager MSP | Leader incumbent | 86.2 | +5.8 | 20.5 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 15.0 | 12.0 | 75.1 | Broad suite, steady builds |
| Checkmk (Community, Pro, Ultimate; formerly Raw, Enterprise, Cloud, MSP) | Challenger | 79.2 | +1.8 | 21.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 16.5 | 11.5 | 73.6 | Open-core platform, steady shipper |
| Centreon (Open Source, IT Edition and Business Edition) | Challenger | 78.6 | +13.2 | 20.5 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 73.3 | Sovereign open-core challenger |
| Elastic Observability (self-managed) | Challenger | 81.2 | +3.4 | 21.0 | 8.5 | 11.0 | 15.0 | 14.5 | 73.0 | Logs-first observability platform |
| ScienceLogic Skylar One (formerly SL1 / EM7) | Challenger | 88.2 | +5.6 | 19.0 | 15.0 | 17.0 | 15.5 | 17.5 | 71.2 | MSP-grade AIOps platform |
| SolarWinds Observability Self-Hosted (formerly Orion Platform / Hybrid Cloud Observability) | Leader incumbent | 89.4 | +3.8 | 19.5 | 16.0 | 14.0 | 13.5 | 11.5 | 68.3 | Broad incumbent, private-equity owned |
| IBM SevOne Network Performance Management and Netcool Operations Insight | Legacy enterprise | 85.4 | +5.2 | 17.0 | 15.5 | 18.0 | 14.5 | 16.0 | 66.6 | Carrier NOC suite, consolidating |
| OpenNMS Horizon and Meridian | Challenger | 75.8 | +0.8 | 19.5 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 11.0 | 65.2 | Open-source network NOC platform |
| Nagios XI (with Nagios Core) | Legacy enterprise | 69.4 | +8.4 | 18.5 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 13.0 | 3.5 | 64.6 | Legacy core, late modernisation |
| Icinga 2 with Icinga Web 2, Icinga DB, Director and Notifications | Challenger | 67.6 | +6.2 | 18.5 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 13.0 | 4.5 | 64.2 | Pure open-source check engine |
| Broadcom DX NetOps and DX UIM | Legacy enterprise | 87.0 | +1.2 | 16.5 | 21.0 | 17.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 61.0 | Carrier-grade suite for top accounts |
| Netdata Agent with self-hosted Parents | Challenger | 65.2 | +4.8 | 19.5 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 60.0 | Per-second agent with on-device ML |
| Paessler PRTG Network Monitor and PRTG Enterprise Monitor | Leader incumbent | 74.2 | +2.6 | 18.5 | 16.0 | 13.5 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 59.6 | Sensor-priced mid-market favourite |
| LibreNMS | Community project | 67.6 | +1.2 | 19.5 | 11.0* | 4.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 59.1 | Community SNMP network monitor |
| Opsview Monitor (ITRS) | Mid-market | 74.6 | +2.0 | 16.5 | 14.5 | 13.0 | 10.5 | 8.5 | 58.3 | Rebuilt Nagios heir, PE-owned |
| Prometheus (with Alertmanager) | Open-source engine | 45.0 | +1.8 | 21.0 | n/a | 5.0 | 12.5 | 4.5 | 57.5 | Cloud-native metrics engine |
| Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) | Legacy enterprise | 67.8 | +0.0 | 16.5 | 10.0 | 16.0 | 11.5 | 3.5 | 54.0 | Windows estate maintenance incumbent |
| Progress WhatsUp Gold | Mid-market | 66.0 | +0.4 | 14.5 | 11.5 | 12.5 | 11.0 | 5.5 | 53.5 | Windows-bound network monitor |
Capability by domain today
| Domain | SolarWinds | ManageEngine | Zabbix | PRTG | Checkmk | Nagios XI | WhatsUp Gold | Broadcom DX | IBM SevOne / Netcool | SCOM | ScienceLogic | Centreon | Icinga | OpenNMS | Grafana Labs | Netdata | Opsview | LibreNMS | Elastic | Prometheus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server, virtualization and storage (12) | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 |
| Network monitoring (12) | 5 | 5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 1 |
| Application and service monitoring (10) | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Data collection and scale (12) | 4.5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 5 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 5 | 4 |
| Alerting and event management (12) | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Visualisation and reporting (8) | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 2 |
| Logs and traces (8) | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 2 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1.5 | 3 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 5 | 0.5 |
| Automation and remediation (8) | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 3 | 4 | 4.5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 4 | 2.5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Security and compliance (8) | 4.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 2 |
| New-platform support (VMware exit) (10) | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 | 2 |
Capability by year
| Year | SolarWinds | ManageEngine | Zabbix | PRTG | Checkmk | Nagios XI | WhatsUp Gold | Broadcom DX | IBM SevOne / Netcool | SCOM | ScienceLogic | Centreon | Icinga | OpenNMS | Grafana Labs | Netdata | Opsview | LibreNMS | Elastic | Prometheus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 67.6 | 63.6 | 62.8 | 60.6 | 64.4 | 56.4 | 61.0 | 74.4 | 64.0 | 62.4 | 62.4 | 55.0 | 52.0 | 62.6 | 31.6 | 34.2 | 56.2 | 53.4 | 53.0 | 33.4 |
| 2017 | 67.6 | 63.6 | 62.8 | 60.6 | 64.4 | 56.4 | 62.0 | 74.4 | 64.0 | 62.4 | 62.4 | 55.0 | 52.8 | 63.4 | 31.6 | 35.4 | 58.0 | 54.6 | 53.0 | 35.8 |
| 2018 | 67.6 | 63.6 | 62.8 | 61.4 | 64.4 | 56.4 | 62.0 | 74.4 | 64.0 | 63.2 | 62.4 | 55.0 | 52.8 | 63.4 | 31.6 | 35.4 | 58.0 | 55.4 | 53.0 | 35.8 |
| 2019 | 80.0 | 75.6 | 66.4 | 65.6 | 70.8 | 61.0 | 62.8 | 82.8 | 71.6 | 67.0 | 75.8 | 60.2 | 59.6 | 67.6 | 45.0 | 49.4 | 64.6 | 63.8 | 69.0 | 39.8 |
| 2020 | 78.4 | 75.6 | 67.2 | 66.6 | 70.8 | 61.0 | 62.8 | 82.8 | 71.6 | 67.0 | 75.8 | 63.0 | 59.6 | 67.6 | 46.0 | 49.4 | 66.6 | 63.8 | 69.0 | 39.8 |
| 2021 | 79.2 | 75.6 | 67.2 | 68.8 | 74.6 | 61.0 | 64.4 | 85.0 | 71.6 | 67.0 | 75.8 | 64.6 | 59.6 | 68.4 | 49.6 | 49.4 | 69.8 | 64.6 | 70.2 | 39.8 |
| 2022 | 85.6 | 80.4 | 75.4 | 71.6 | 77.4 | 61.0 | 65.6 | 85.8 | 80.2 | 67.8 | 82.6 | 65.4 | 61.4 | 75.0 | 67.6 | 60.4 | 72.6 | 66.4 | 77.8 | 43.2 |
| 2023 | 85.6 | 81.6 | 75.4 | 71.6 | 77.4 | 61.0 | 65.6 | 85.8 | 80.2 | 67.8 | 82.6 | 67.4 | 62.6 | 75.0 | 67.6 | 60.4 | 72.6 | 66.4 | 77.8 | 43.2 |
| 2024 | 85.6 | 82.4 | 78.6 | 71.6 | 78.4 | 61.0 | 66.0 | 85.8 | 80.2 | 67.8 | 85.2 | 75.2 | 65.8 | 74.8 | 73.0 | 62.4 | 74.6 | 67.6 | 79.0 | 45.0 |
| 2025 | 87.4 | 83.2 | 78.6 | 70.0 | 78.4 | 62.6 | 65.2 | 87.0 | 81.4 | 67.8 | 88.2 | 77.4 | 65.8 | 75.8 | 73.0 | 64.4 | 74.6 | 67.6 | 81.2 | 45.0 |
| 2026 | 89.4 | 86.2 | 83.4 | 74.2 | 79.2 | 69.4 | 66.0 | 87.0 | 85.4 | 67.8 | 88.2 | 78.6 | 67.6 | 75.8 | 77.8 | 65.2 | 74.6 | 67.6 | 81.2 | 45.0 |
How to read these scores
- Commercial products, open-core and open-source projects are scored on the same ten domains. * marks sustainability risk (LibreNMS, no company behind it) in place of commercial risk; Prometheus is an engine with no commercial-risk score, so its buyer safety uses lock-in only.
- History is scored at the end of 2016, 2019 and 2022 and today against fixed anchors; products launched later start in their launch year.
- The Ledger Index is shown only for 2023 onward, because credibility, risk and integrator fit are scored for that window only.
- Entries marked not ranked lack enough public evidence; their scores are shown for reference only.
Related reading
- Related Ledger: VM Platform Ledger 2026
- Related Ledger: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Related Ledger: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Network monitoring guide
- AIOps tools
Download the data
Every score in this edition, free to reuse with a link back to this page.