Opsview Monitor: Monitoring Ledger 2026
Opsview, rebuilt by ITRS on microservices, adds Proxmox, AHV and AI hooks with mostly on-time releases, and is strong on business views and multi-tenancy.
Part of the Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger (edition 2026-10-04). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Tier: Mid-market
- Owner: ITRS Group (majority TA Associates, private equity, since 2021; Montagu minority); ITRS bought Opsview in 2018
- Licence model: Proprietary annual subscription by monitored-host band; no free edition since 2013
- Products scored: Opsview Monitor 6.x self-hosted (Enterprise) with Business Service Monitoring and Flow Collector; Opsview Cloud not scored
- Latest release: 6.8.3, 2026-04-21
- Next signal: More MCP tool endpoints and ML baselines, KubeVirt and Proxmox work, FIPS 140-3 validation; no dated release announced
- Archetype: Rebuilt Nagios heir, PE-owned
- Evidence grade: B. Release notes come almost entirely from one vendor knowledge-base page; several 'today' claims (FIPS, vault, KubeVirt, OpenStack) are not tied to a release and were discounted.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 74.6 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +2.0 points | higher is better |
| Credibility | 16.5 / 25 | higher is better |
| Commercial risk | 14.5 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 13.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Integrator fit | 10.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 8.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 58.3 / 100 | balanced weights |
Capability by domain
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2016 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Server, virtualization and storage (12) | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 |
| Network monitoring (12) | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Application and service monitoring (10) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Data collection and scale (12) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Alerting and event management (12) | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 |
| Visualisation and reporting (8) | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Logs and traces (8) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Automation and remediation (8) | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 |
| Security and compliance (8) | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 |
| New-platform support (VMware exit) (10) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Total / 100 | 56.2 | 64.6 | 72.6 | 74.6 |
Year by year: 2016: 56.2 · 2017: 58.0 · 2018: 58.0 · 2019: 64.6 · 2020: 66.6 · 2021: 69.8 · 2022: 72.6 · 2023: 72.6 · 2024: 74.6 · 2025: 74.6 · 2026: 74.6
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Automation and remediation | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | 5.4 (2017): ServiceNow connector; 6.x official Ansible roles |
| 2017 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 1 → 1.5 | +1.0 | 5.4 (2017): AWS CloudWatch and Azure Opspacks |
| 2019 | Alerting and event management | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | 6.2 (2019): notification profiles, on-call rotations, PagerDuty, Slack and Teams webhooks, BSM-impact alerts |
| 2019 | Data collection and scale | 3 → 4 | +2.4 | 6.0/6.2 (2019): collector clusters over RabbitMQ, InfluxDB, automatic collector failover, 100,000+ checks |
| 2019 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 1.5 → 2 | +1.0 | 6.1/6.2 (2019): Kubernetes Opspack GA and GCP Opspack; AHV only via community scripts |
| 2019 | Security and compliance | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | 6.x (2019): mTLS between microservices and collectors, audit log of configuration edits |
| 2019 | Server, virtualization and storage | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | 6.2 (2019): Kubernetes Opspack GA, Docker, IPMI, iDRAC and iLO hardware Opspacks |
| 2020 | Network monitoring | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | 6.3 (2020): Flow Collector GA for NetFlow v5/v9, sFlow and IPFIX with top talkers |
| 2020 | Security and compliance | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | 6.3 (2020): SAML 2.0 SSO; 6.4 adds Azure AD; FIPS, vault and air-gap claims unverified |
| 2021 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 2 → 3 | +2.0 | 6.4 (2021): Nutanix AHV Opspack GA via Prism REST API |
| 2021 | Server, virtualization and storage | 3.5 → 4 | +1.2 | 6.4 (2021): Nutanix AHV Opspack GA; Pure, PowerStore and Nimble storage Opspacks |
| 2022 | Alerting and event management | 3.5 → 4 | +1.2 | 6.5 (2022): rule-based alert storm suppression; bi-directional ServiceNow and Jira ticketing |
| 2022 | Automation and remediation | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | 6.5 (2022): webhooks drive Ansible AWX and Rundeck runbooks; tag-based host sync; REST API v2 GA 2020 |
| 2022 | Visualisation and reporting | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | 6.5 (2022): flow dashlets, geographic maps; capacity reports need separate ITRS Capacity Planner |
| 2024 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 3 → 4 | +2.0 | 6.7 (2024): Proxmox VE Opspack GA; KubeVirt, OpenShift Virtualization and OpenStack claims undated |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05 | Plans simplified to Opsview Cloud and Opsview Enterprise subscriptions | D12 Packaging and licensing | M |
| 2023-11 | 6.6: OpenTelemetry metrics ingestion preview | D3 Applications and services | U |
| 2023-11 | 6.6: RHEL 9 and Rocky Linux 9 support | D4 Collection and scale | C |
| 2023-11 | 6.6: hardened mTLS between services | D9 Security | C |
| 2024-10 | 6.7: Proxmox VE Opspack GA | D1 Server and virtualization | M |
| 2024-10 | 6.7: deeper ITRS Geneos event bridge | D11 Ecosystem openness | P |
| 2025-04 | 6.7.2: Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Opspack, OpenSSL 3.2 | D2 Network | C |
| 2025-09 | 6.8.0: ML anomaly baselines GA | D7 AI-assisted operations | M |
| 2025-09 | 6.8.0: NVIDIA GPU Opspack | D1 Server and virtualization | M |
| 2025-09 | 6.8.0: root-cause correlation across BSM trees | D5 Alerting and events | C |
| 2026-04 | 6.8.3: MCP server GA | D7 AI-assisted operations | M |
| 2026-04 | 6.8.3: VMware-exit migration assessment dashboards | D6 Visualisation and reporting | M |
| 2026-04 | 6.8.3: sub-second streaming telemetry pipeline | D4 Collection and scale | C |
- Centre of gravity: Collection and scale (2), Server and virtualization (2), AI-assisted operations (2)
- Driver mix: Vision 0%, Customer need 38%, Market window 46%, Upstream 8%, Portfolio 8%
Credibility: 16.5 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 3 | One or two minor releases a year since 2019 (6.6 2023, 6.7 2024, 6.8 2025, 6.8.3 2026); no published rhythm |
| Roadmap transparency | 3 | Public knowledge-base release notes and lifecycle matrix; direction via webinars and client briefings |
| Say-do | 4.5 | 7 of 8 tracked promises GA within 12 months; NVIDIA GPU Opspack shipped 18 months late (2025) |
| Velocity | 3 | One or two substantive capabilities per release, for example Proxmox in 6.7, anomaly baselines and MCP in 6.8 |
| Lifecycle stability | 3 | Opsview 6 rewrite (2019) replaced Nagios Core; stable since, with RHEL 8 to 9 platform moves |
Say-do record, 2023 to 2026: Research ledger: 6 of 6 promises shipped (RHEL 9, Geneos bridge, Proxmox, anomaly baselines, MCP, VMware-exit dashboards), lags 0 to 4 months. AI evidence adds the NVIDIA GPU Opspack, 18 months late. Single-source dating.
Commercial risk: 14.5 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Price and licence volatility | 1.5 | 2023-05: plans cut to two subscription tiers (Cloud and Enterprise); no metric change recorded |
| Purchase constraints | 4 | Subscription only, host bands from 500 hosts; no perpetual or free option |
| Channel and access | 2.5 | Documentation public; prices quote-only; trial and partner programme not documented |
| Owner stability | 4 | Private-equity owned: ITRS bought Opsview 2018, TA Associates majority stake 2021 |
| Cost of staying supported | 2.5 | Support and updates inside the subscription; no paid-for-formerly-free change recorded |
Security record of the product itself: None found in the KEV catalogue (the security record). Not exploited: CVE-2022-30283 authenticated command injection (fixed 6.4, 2021) and CVE-2021-36367 Windows agent privilege escalation (agent 6.3.2).
Technical lock-in: 13.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 3.5 | Proprietary Opspack bundles and BSM models in MySQL; metrics in InfluxDB |
| Export path | 3 | REST API v2 covers configuration; BSM trees and flow settings must be re-authored elsewhere |
| Stack coupling | 3.5 | Own microservices, RabbitMQ, InfluxDB and agent required; check_* plugins and SNMP/WMI reusable |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 0.5 | Any hardware on RHEL; air-gapped install supported; SaaS optional |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 2.5 | Nagios plugin skills transfer; Opspack authoring is product-specific |
Integrator fit: 10.5 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Partner programme openness | 2 | No partner programme described in the research; sold inside the ITRS portfolio |
| Multi-tenancy and self-service | 3.5 | Built-in tenancies isolate users, dashboards and notifications for MSPs; no billing |
| API and infrastructure-as-code | 3.5 | REST API v2 with OpenAPI (2020) and official Ansible roles; no Terraform provider recorded |
| Skills and certification | 1.5 | No certification programme recorded |
AI leverage: 8.5 / 20
| Strand | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|
| AIOps on monitoring data | 2.5 | 2025: 6.8.0 (2025): ML anomaly baselines GA; NVIDIA GPU Opspack |
| AI platform stack | 0 | none |
| AI-assisted operations | 2 | 2025: 6.8.0 (2025): anomaly detection GA; no natural-language assistant |
| Agent openness | 4 | 2026: 6.8.3 (2026): MCP server GA exposing health and BSM states |
AI say-do: 2 announced, 2 GA (anomaly baselines on time; GPU Opspack 18 months late), 0 preview, 0 pending, 0 dropped. The AI is statistical anomaly baselining plus an MCP server; there is no LLM assistant in the product.
Reading
Opsview is a Nagios-derived monitor that ITRS rebuilt in 2019 as Go and Python microservices on InfluxDB, and it is now adding hypervisor breadth (Nutanix AHV 2021, Proxmox 2024) and AI hooks (anomaly baselines 2025, an MCP server 2026). The record shows one or two solid releases a year and promises that mostly shipped on time, with business-service views and multi-tenancy as long-standing strengths. The trade-off is a proprietary Opspack format, subscription-only buying from a private-equity owner, and evidence that rests largely on the vendor's own knowledge base.
Open questions and evidence caveats
- Most facts come from one vendor knowledge-base page; FIPS 140-3, secrets vaulting, KubeVirt and OpenStack claims have no release and were not credited in full.
- The capability text mentions natural-language dashboard generation, but the AI evidence finds no LLM assistant; it was not scored.
- List prices are not published; the 500-host minimum and price range are estimates in the research.
- ITRS's focus on Geneos and financial services may steer the roadmap away from general infrastructure buyers.
Related reading
- Related Ledger: Proxmox VE in the VM Platform Ledger 2026
- Related Ledger: Nutanix in the VM Platform Ledger 2026
- Network monitoring guide
More from Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Broadcom DX NetOps and DX UIM: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Centreon: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Checkmk: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Elastic Observability: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Grafana Labs self-hosted stack: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- IBM SevOne / Netcool: Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Icinga: Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- LibreNMS: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- ManageEngine OpManager Nexus: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Microsoft System Center Operations Manager: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Nagios XI: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Netdata Agent with self-hosted Parents: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- OpenNMS Horizon and Meridian: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Progress WhatsUp Gold: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Prometheus: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- PRTG: Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026
- ScienceLogic Skylar One: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- SolarWinds Observability Self-Hosted: Monitoring Ledger 2026
- Zabbix: Monitoring Ledger 2026