Mr.PlanB Logo

    #17 of 20 infrastructure monitoring tools · Updated October 2026

    Opsview review 2026

    Opsview Monitor (ITRS) · Rebuilt Nagios heir, PE-owned

    Opsview ranks #17 of 20 infrastructure monitoring tools in the Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 58.3 out of 100. Opsview, rebuilt by ITRS on microservices, adds Proxmox, AHV and AI hooks with mostly on-time releases, and is strong on business views and multi-tenancy.

    Scores

    Ledger Index
    58.3/100
    #17 of 20
    Capability
    74.6/100
    Credibility
    16.5/25
    Commercial risk
    14.5/25
    lower is better
    Lock-in
    13/25
    lower is better
    AI delivery
    8.5/20

    Source: Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026, edition 2026-10-04. How each score works: methodology.

    Pros

    • Server, virtualization and storage4/5
    • Data collection and scale4/5
    • Alerting and event management4/5
    • Automation and remediation4/5

    Cons

    • Logs and traces2.5/5

    What the Ledger says

    Opsview is a Nagios-derived monitor that ITRS rebuilt in 2019 as Go and Python microservices on InfluxDB, and it is now adding hypervisor breadth (Nutanix AHV 2021, Proxmox 2024) and AI hooks (anomaly baselines 2025, an MCP server 2026). The record shows one or two solid releases a year and promises that mostly shipped on time, with business-service views and multi-tenancy as long-standing strengths. The trade-off is a proprietary Opspack format, subscription-only buying from a private-equity owner, and evidence that rests largely on the vendor's own knowledge base.

    AI say-do: 2 announced, 2 GA (anomaly baselines on time; GPU Opspack 18 months late), 0 preview, 0 pending, 0 dropped. The AI is statistical anomaly baselining plus an MCP server; there is no LLM assistant in the product.

    Capability by area

    Server, virtualization and storage4/5
    Network monitoring3.5/5
    Application and service monitoring3.5/5
    Data collection and scale4/5
    Alerting and event management4/5
    Visualisation and reporting3.5/5
    Logs and traces2.5/5
    Automation and remediation4/5
    Security and compliance4/5
    New-platform support (VMware exit)4/5

    Buying, lock-in and release record

    Buying and licence (commercial risk)(lower is better)

    Price and licence volatility1.5
    2023-05: plans cut to two subscription tiers (Cloud and Enterprise); no metric change recorded
    Purchase constraints4
    Subscription only, host bands from 500 hosts; no perpetual or free option
    Channel and access2.5
    Documentation public; prices quote-only; trial and partner programme not documented
    Owner stability4
    Private-equity owned: ITRS bought Opsview 2018, TA Associates majority stake 2021
    Cost of staying supported2.5
    Support and updates inside the subscription; no paid-for-formerly-free change recorded

    Technical lock-in(lower is better)

    Formats3.5
    Proprietary Opspack bundles and BSM models in MySQL; metrics in InfluxDB
    Export path3
    REST API v2 covers configuration; BSM trees and flow settings must be re-authored elsewhere
    Stack coupling3.5
    Own microservices, RabbitMQ, InfluxDB and agent required; check_* plugins and SNMP/WMI reusable
    Hardware / cloud coupling0.5
    Any hardware on RHEL; air-gapped install supported; SaaS optional
    Skills and tooling coupling2.5
    Nagios plugin skills transfer; Opspack authoring is product-specific

    Release credibility

    Cadence3
    One or two minor releases a year since 2019 (6.6 2023, 6.7 2024, 6.8 2025, 6.8.3 2026); no published rhythm
    Roadmap transparency3
    Public knowledge-base release notes and lifecycle matrix; direction via webinars and client briefings
    Say-do4.5
    7 of 8 tracked promises GA within 12 months; NVIDIA GPU Opspack shipped 18 months late (2025)
    Velocity3
    One or two substantive capabilities per release, for example Proxmox in 6.7, anomaly baselines and MCP in 6.8
    Lifecycle stability3
    Opsview 6 rewrite (2019) replaced Nagios Core; stable since, with RHEL 8 to 9 platform moves

    Partners and services

    Partner programme openness2
    No partner programme described in the research; sold inside the ITRS portfolio
    Multi-tenancy and self-service3.5
    Built-in tenancies isolate users, dashboards and notifications for MSPs; no billing
    API and infrastructure-as-code3.5
    REST API v2 with OpenAPI (2020) and official Ansible roles; no Terraform provider recorded
    Skills and certification1.5
    No certification programme recorded

    Alternatives to Opsview

    Is Opsview right for you?

    Describe what you run and the free advisor ranks Opsview against the other infrastructure monitoring tools for your case.

    Open the advisor

    Questions about Opsview

    Is Opsview any good?

    Opsview ranks #17 of 20 infrastructure monitoring tools in the Infrastructure Monitoring Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 58.3 out of 100. Its strongest areas are server, virtualization and storage, data collection and scale, alerting and event management. Its weakest are logs and traces.

    What are the best alternatives to Opsview?

    The closest by Ledger Index are Prometheus (57.5), LibreNMS (59.1), PRTG (59.6), Netdata (60).

    How is Opsview licensed and sold?

    2023-05: plans cut to two subscription tiers (Cloud and Enterprise); no metric change recorded.

    How much lock-in does Opsview bring?

    Opsview scores 13 out of 25 on technical lock-in (lower is better). Export path: REST API v2 covers configuration; BSM trees and flow settings must be re-authored elsewhere.

    User reviews of Opsview

    No reviews yet

    Be the first to say how Opsview worked for you.

    Write a review

    No account needed and no email asked. We read every review before it appears and remove adverts, spam and personal attacks.

    Your rating