Mr.PlanB Logo

    #27 of 28 infrastructure automation tools · Updated October 2026

    Cinc review 2026

    Cinc (community builds of Chef) · Volunteer rebuild, now a fork

    Cinc ranks #27 of 28 infrastructure automation tools in the Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 41.6 out of 100. Cinc rebuilds Chef without licence keys and lags it by weeks; from November 2026 it must also maintain the server Progress retires, with no funding on record.

    Scores

    Ledger Index
    41.6/100
    #27 of 28
    Capability
    45.4/100
    Credibility
    13.5/25
    Commercial risk
    14.5/25
    lower is better
    Lock-in
    10/25
    lower is better
    AI delivery
    2/20

    Source: Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026, edition 2026-10-16. How each score works: methodology.

    Pros

    • Configuration management depth4/5

    Cons

    • AI assistance0/5
    • Provisioning breadth1/5
    • Orchestration and self-service1.5/5

    What the Ledger says

    Cinc is the free path for a Chef estate: the same source, rebuilt without licence keys, and a documented migration in both directions. It has lagged upstream by weeks to months for seven years, and it now takes on more than rebuilding, because the Chef Infra Server source freezes at the end of October 2026 and Cinc Server 16.0.0 is meant to carry on as an independent fork in maintenance mode. No legal entity, funding or security process is on record. A buyer should watch whether Cinc Server 16.0.0 ships around November 2026 and who signs its releases.

    Cinc has no AI feature and no MCP server. The agent path is the Chef Server API, and the upstream AI Assistant is a SaaS beta that a rebuild cannot carry.

    Capability by area

    Provisioning breadth1/5
    Configuration management depth4/5
    State, planning and safety2.5/5
    Language and authoring3/5
    Orchestration and self-service1.5/5
    Scale and control plane3.5/5
    Security and compliance2.5/5
    Bare metal and day-2 operations1.5/5
    Ecosystem and integrations3/5
    AI assistance0/5

    Buying, lock-in and release record

    Buying and licence (commercial risk)(lower is better)

    Maintainer concentration3.5
    Small volunteer team; contributor count not found; the GitLab releases page returned an error
    Backer health3.5
    No legal entity or funding found; builds hosted by the OSU Open Source Lab; trademark use coordinated with Progress
    Licence-change risk2
    Apache 2.0 rebuild; depends on Progress keeping the Chef source open, which it says it will
    Abandonment signs2.5
    Upstream 19.4 (2026-10-14) not yet rebuilt; latest 19.x build from May 2026; the Server fork is pending
    Security response3
    Fixes arrive only as rebuilds of upstream releases; no advisory process found

    Technical lock-in(lower is better)

    Formats3
    Chef cookbooks and node objects
    Export path2.5
    Documented two-way migration with Chef through knife-ec-backup
    Stack coupling1
    Omnibus builds on any OS
    Hardware / cloud coupling0.5
    None
    Skills and tooling coupling3
    Chef skills transfer; a shrinking pool

    Release credibility

    Cadence3
    Rebuilds follow upstream with a lag of weeks to months; 19.1 to 19.3 within about three months, 19.4 not yet built
    Roadmap transparency3
    Blog posts for the Server fork and the platform policy; no dated roadmap
    Say-do3
    Server stable shipped in 2022; Server 16.0.0 fork pending; too few dated promises to judge
    Velocity2
    Rebuilds by design; no features of its own
    Lifecycle stability2.5
    No written lifecycle; a platform policy since 2026-10-11; depends on upstream and volunteers

    Partners and services

    Partner programme openness2
    No programme; no support providers found
    Multi-tenancy and self-service1
    Server organisations only
    API and infrastructure-as-code3
    Chef Server API
    Skills and certification1.5
    Community only

    Alternatives to Cinc

    Questions about Cinc

    Is Cinc any good?

    Cinc ranks #27 of 28 infrastructure automation tools in the Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 41.6 out of 100. Its strongest areas are configuration management depth. Its weakest are ai assistance, provisioning breadth, orchestration and self-service.

    What are the best alternatives to Cinc?

    The closest by Ledger Index are Digger (42.8), Metal3 (43.9), Tinkerbell (36.9), Salt (47.5).

    How is Cinc licensed and sold?

    Small volunteer team; contributor count not found; the GitLab releases page returned an error.

    How much lock-in does Cinc bring?

    Cinc scores 10 out of 25 on technical lock-in (lower is better). Export path: Documented two-way migration with Chef through knife-ec-backup.

    User reviews of Cinc

    No reviews yet

    Be the first to say how Cinc worked for you.

    Write a review

    No account needed and no email asked. We read every review before it appears and remove adverts, spam and personal attacks.

    Your rating