Mr.PlanB Logo

    #6 of 28 infrastructure automation tools · Updated October 2026

    Ansible review 2026

    Ansible (ansible-core and the community package) · Dependable engine on a published calendar

    Ansible ranks #6 of 28 infrastructure automation tools in the Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 60.4 out of 100. The open-source engine inside Ansible Automation Platform: agentless and broad through its collections, with no state file, control plane or AI of its own.

    Scores

    Ledger Index
    60.4/100
    #6 of 28
    Capability
    58.6/100
    Credibility
    19.5/25
    Commercial risk
    n/a/25
    lower is better
    Lock-in
    4.5/25
    lower is better
    AI delivery
    1/20

    Source: Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026, edition 2026-10-16. How each score works: methodology.

    Pros

    • Ecosystem and integrations4.5/5
    • Provisioning breadth4/5
    • Configuration management depth4/5
    • Language and authoring4/5

    Cons

    • AI assistance0/5
    • State, planning and safety2/5
    • Orchestration and self-service2/5

    What the Ledger says

    Ansible is the most widely reached automation engine on this list, and the collections model means its breadth is now set by vendors and community teams as much as by Red Hat. The engine itself has changed slowly since 2020: the real movement is in collections and in the 2.19 templating rework. Its limits are structural: no state file, no drift detection, no control plane and no AI, so every one of those needs a product on top. The thing to check before you build on it is which collection covers your platform and who maintains it, because Proxmox VE and XCP-ng are community or nothing while vSphere, Nutanix and Hyper-V have certified content.

    The engine has no AI feature of its own and no official agent interface. Agents can call it only through the command line or the runner library, which is why the AI score sits near zero here while the platform built on it scores.

    Capability by area

    Provisioning breadth4/5
    Configuration management depth4/5
    State, planning and safety2/5
    Language and authoring4/5
    Orchestration and self-service2/5
    Scale and control plane2/5
    Security and compliance2.5/5
    Bare metal and day-2 operations3/5
    Ecosystem and integrations4.5/5
    AI assistance0/5

    Buying, lock-in and release record

    Technical lock-in(lower is better)

    Formats1
    Open YAML and plain-text inventory, Ansible specific
    Export path2
    No state to export; leaving means rewriting playbooks in another tool
    Stack coupling0.5
    Agentless; needs Python on Linux targets and PowerShell 5.1 or later on Windows
    Hardware / cloud coupling0
    Any host, fully offline
    Skills and tooling coupling1
    Widely held skills; open tooling

    Release credibility

    Cadence4.5
    Published May and November rhythm, kept for 2.20 (2025-11-03) and 2.21 (2026-05-18); 2.19 landed 2025-07-21
    Roadmap transparency4.5
    Public per-release roadmap pages with dates, open tracker, porting guides; feature plans beyond deprecations are thin
    Say-do4
    Dated releases held; deprecation promises for 2.23 and 2.24 still pending
    Velocity3.5
    2.19 brought several substantive changes; 2.20 and 2.21 were maintenance and platform floors
    Lifecycle stability3
    About 18 to 24 months per version, no LTS, Python floor rises each cycle, templating breaks in 2.19

    Partners and services

    Partner programme openness3
    No programme for the engine; anyone can build on it; certified content runs through Red Hat Partner Connect
    Multi-tenancy and self-service0.5
    None in the engine
    API and infrastructure-as-code3.5
    CLI, ansible-runner library and ansible-rulebook; no REST API of its own
    Skills and certification4.5
    Exam-based Red Hat certification (EX294) and a very large talent pool

    Alternatives to Ansible

    Questions about Ansible

    Is Ansible any good?

    Ansible ranks #6 of 28 infrastructure automation tools in the Infrastructure Automation Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 60.4 out of 100. Its strongest areas are ecosystem and integrations, provisioning breadth, configuration management depth. Its weakest are ai assistance, state, planning and safety, orchestration and self-service.

    What are the best alternatives to Ansible?

    The closest by Ledger Index are Bicep (59.6), Pulumi (61.2), Harness IaCM (59.3), CloudFormation (62).

    How much lock-in does Ansible bring?

    Ansible scores 4.5 out of 25 on technical lock-in (lower is better). Export path: No state to export; leaving means rewriting playbooks in another tool.

    User reviews of Ansible

    No reviews yet

    Be the first to say how Ansible worked for you.

    Write a review

    No account needed and no email asked. We read every review before it appears and remove adverts, spam and personal attacks.

    Your rating