Bareos: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
Bareos is the most complete open-source backup platform here and is moving fastest toward VMware leavers, but one small company writes most of the code.
Part of the Open-Source Backup Ledger (edition 2026-10-02). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Kind: Backup platform
- Licence: AGPLv3; all plugins (VMware, Proxmox, Hyper-V, NDMP, MSSQL) open source
- Backer: Bareos GmbH & Co. KG (Cologne), which sells subscriptions
- Paid edition or support: Subscriptions Basic to Platinum with certified repositories and long-term support (quote only)
- Latest release: 25.1.1, 2026-09-03
- Next signal: Bareos 26: Vue web UI as default, Proxmox and Hyper-V plugin hardening, GlusterFS removal
- Archetype: Vendor-led open platform, growing fastest
- Evidence grade: A. CHANGELOG, PRs and releases read on GitHub. Yearly commit figures are 100-commit samples.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 75.4 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +16.2 points | higher is better |
| Credibility | 20.5 / 25 | higher is better |
| Sustainability risk | 9.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 10.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Support and ecosystem | 15.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 1.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 67.7 / 100 | balanced weights |
Capability by domain
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2016 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual and physical servers (12) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Databases and applications (12) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Recovery (14) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Cyber resilience (14) | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 3.5 |
| Storage efficiency and targets (10) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| Long-term retention and tape (6) | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 5 |
| Replication and DR (10) | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Security and compliance (8) | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 |
| New-platform support (VMware exit) (8) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4 |
| Management at scale and automation (6) | 2.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 |
| Total / 100 | 49.8 | 58.0 | 59.2 | 75.4 |
Year by year: 2016: 49.8 · 2017: 49.8 · 2018: 49.8 · 2019: 58.0 · 2020: 58.0 · 2021: 58.0 · 2022: 59.2 · 2023: 60.4 · 2024: 64.2 · 2025: 74.8 · 2026: 75.4
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Cyber resilience | 1.5 → 2 | +1.4 | TLS-PSK; retention locks |
| 2019 | Databases and applications | 2 → 3 | +2.4 | MSSQL VDI with log backups; PostgreSQL and MySQL plugins; NDMP |
| 2019 | Management at scale and automation | 2.5 → 3 | +0.6 | python-bareos library |
| 2019 | Replication and DR | 2.5 → 3 | +1.0 | Offsite copies to S3 |
| 2019 | Security and compliance | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | TLS-PSK; web UI multi-tenancy and ACLs |
| 2019 | Storage efficiency and targets | 2 → 3 | +2.0 | S3 through the Droplet backend |
| 2022 | Long-term retention and tape | 4 → 4.5 | +0.6 | Tape lifecycle with LTO encryption management |
| 2022 | Management at scale and automation | 3 → 3.5 | +0.6 | Ansible collection |
| 2023 | Databases and applications | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | 23.0: rewritten PostgreSQL plugin; MariaDB backup plugin |
| 2024 | Cyber resilience | 2 → 3 | +2.8 | 24.0: native WORM storage backend |
| 2024 | Storage efficiency and targets | 3 → 3.5 | +1.0 | 24.0: dedupable storage backend |
| 2025 | Cyber resilience | 3 → 3.5 | +1.4 | 25.0: media_vault air-gap rotation |
| 2025 | Long-term retention and tape | 4.5 → 5 | +0.6 | WORM tape and offsite vaulting |
| 2025 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 1.5 → 4 | +4.0 | 25.0/25.1: agentless Proxmox, Hyper-V and Incus |
| 2025 | Recovery | 3 → 3.5 | +1.4 | 25.0: Proxmox and Hyper-V VM restore; Windows bare-metal imager |
| 2025 | Security and compliance | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | Role-based web UI access, LDAP/AD; MFA only through PAM |
| 2025 | Virtual and physical servers | 3.5 → 4.5 | +2.4 | 25.0: agentless Proxmox and Hyper-V plugins |
| 2026 | Management at scale and automation | 3.5 → 4 | +0.6 | 25.1: Vue web UI, gRPC plugins, Prometheus exporter |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12 | 23.0: PostgreSQL plugin rewrite | D2 Databases and applications | C |
| 2023-12 | 23.0: parallel compression in the file daemon | D5 Storage efficiency | C |
| 2024-12 | 24.0: dedupable storage backend | D5 Storage efficiency | C |
| 2024-12 | 24.0: gRPC out-of-process plugins | D10 Scale and automation | V |
| 2024-12 | 24.0: native WORM media support | D4 Cyber resilience | M |
| 2025-12 | 25.0: Windows bare-metal imager (barri) | D3 Recovery | C |
| 2025-12 | 25.0: agentless Hyper-V plugin | D1 Virtual and physical servers | M |
| 2025-12 | 25.0: agentless Proxmox VE plugin | D1 Virtual and physical servers | M |
| 2025-12 | 25.0: media_vault air-gap rotation | D4 Cyber resilience | M |
| 2026-08 | 25.1: Incus/LXD plugin; Vue web UI | D1 Virtual and physical servers | C |
- Centre of gravity: Virtual and physical servers (3), Storage efficiency (2), Cyber resilience (2)
- Driver mix: Vision 10%, Customer need 50%, Market window 40%, Upstream 0%, Portfolio 0%
Credibility: 20.5 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 4.5 | Yearly major release with 10 to 16 tags a year |
| Roadmap transparency | 4.5 | Public GitHub PRs, milestones and CHANGELOG |
| Say-do | 4 | 10 of 10 items shipped, but with 10 to 27 months from proposal to release |
| Velocity | 4 | Steady feature delivery every year |
| Lifecycle stability | 3.5 | Up to 5 years of LTS for subscribers; MySQL and SQLite catalog backends removed in 21 |
Say-do record, 2023 to 2026: 10 forward items since 2023, all shipped. Lags were long: dedupe backend about 20 months, Proxmox plugin about 23, new web UI about 27.
Sustainability risk: 9.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Maintainer concentration | 3.5 | 81 to 97% of sampled commits from bareos.com |
| Backer health | 2 | Bareos GmbH, stable since 2012, small company |
| Licence-change risk | 1.5 | AGPLv3 with every plugin open; no relicensing in 16 years |
| Abandonment signs | 0.5 | Active: last commit 2026-10-02, 57 open issues with a 24-day median age |
| Security response | 1.5 | Active maintenance; advisory process not separately checked |
Project health: Last release 2026-09-03. 1,260 stars, 317 forks. 57 open issues (median age 24 days), 38 open PRs (24 days). 6 to 14 distinct authors a year; maintainer handover to Andreas Rogge and Sebastian Sura in 2023.
Technical lock-in: 10.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 3 | Bareos volume format (from Bacula) |
| Export path | 1.5 | bextract and bls read volumes without the Director |
| Stack coupling | 2.5 | Daemons plus a mandatory PostgreSQL catalog; PHP or Vue web UI |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 0 | Any POSIX storage, tape or S3; no phone-home |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 3 | Bacula-style configuration skills |
Support and ecosystem: 15.5 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Paid support | 4 | Four subscription tiers with LTS packages |
| Consultants and partners | 4 | Partners in Europe, North America and Japan; training and certification |
| Documentation | 4 | Versioned documentation per release |
| Community and packaging | 3.5 | Official repositories for all major distros; Google group, GitHub discussions |
AI leverage: 1.5 / 20
| Strand | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|
| AI for protection / protecting AI | 0 | none |
| AI platform stack | 0 | none |
| AI-assisted operations | 0 | none |
| Agent openness | 1.5 | 2019: python-bareos library and Director API |
No AI or machine-learning feature, and none announced.
Reading
Bareos is the most complete open-source backup platform in this Ledger and the one moving fastest toward VMware leavers: agentless Proxmox and Hyper-V arrived in 2025, on top of long-standing VMware, tape and database support. Everything is AGPLv3 with no closed plugins, and the company behind it ships every year. The trade-offs are long lead times from proposal to release and dependence on one small company for nearly all commits.
Open questions and evidence caveats
- The Proxmox and Hyper-V plugins are less than a year old; production maturity is the next thing to check.
- Yearly commit figures are samples of 100 commits, so trends rely on distinct authors and release counts.
- MFA is only available through PAM or a reverse proxy, not natively.
Related reading
More from Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Open-Source Backup Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Amanda Community: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- BackupPC: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Bacula Community: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Barman: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- BorgBackup: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Burp: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Kopia: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Percona XtraBackup: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- pgBackRest: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Proxmox Backup Server: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Relax-and-Recover: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- restic: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- UrBackup: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- WAL-G: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Xen Orchestra: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026