Bacula Community: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
Bacula Community is still a capable tape-first backup system, and 15.0.2 brought real ransomware defences (immutable volumes, malware checks).
Part of the Open-Source Backup Ledger (edition 2026-10-02). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Kind: Backup platform
- Licence: AGPLv3 with Section 7 terms (FLOSS exception, trademark clause); contributions need a copyright assignment
- Backer: Bacula Systems SA (Switzerland), which sells Bacula Enterprise
- Paid edition or support: Bacula Enterprise subscriptions (quote only); hypervisor and database plugins are Enterprise-only
- Latest release: 17.0.0, 2026-08-06
- Next signal: 17.x: catalog 1027 stabilisation, storage-group balancing, tighter daemon TLS
- Archetype: Open-core platform with a thinning community edition
- Evidence grade: A. Release notes and GitLab API read directly; GitLab issues are disabled, so issue-age metrics are missing.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 58.0 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +5.6 points | higher is better |
| Credibility | 15.5 / 25 | higher is better |
| Sustainability risk | 15.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 10.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Support and ecosystem | 14.0 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 1.5 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 51.8 / 100 | balanced weights |
Capability by domain
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2016 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual and physical servers (12) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Databases and applications (12) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Recovery (14) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Cyber resilience (14) | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | 3.5 |
| Storage efficiency and targets (10) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Long-term retention and tape (6) | 4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Replication and DR (10) | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Security and compliance (8) | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 |
| New-platform support (VMware exit) (8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Management at scale and automation (6) | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 |
| Total / 100 | 45.4 | 51.6 | 52.4 | 58.0 |
Year by year: 2016: 45.4 · 2017: 45.4 · 2018: 45.4 · 2019: 51.6 · 2020: 51.6 · 2021: 51.6 · 2022: 52.4 · 2023: 52.4 · 2024: 58.0 · 2025: 58.0 · 2026: 58.0
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Cyber resilience | 1.5 → 2 | +1.4 | 9.4: WORM tape cartridges |
| 2019 | Long-term retention and tape | 4 → 4.5 | +0.6 | 9.4: WORM tape |
| 2019 | Management at scale and automation | 2.5 → 3.5 | +1.2 | Baculum web console and REST API |
| 2019 | Replication and DR | 2.5 → 3 | +1.0 | Copy jobs to S3 |
| 2019 | Storage efficiency and targets | 2 → 3 | +2.0 | 9.4: S3 cloud driver |
| 2022 | Security and compliance | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | 11.0/13.0: TLS-PSK, audit events, LDAP console login |
| 2024 | Cyber resilience | 2 → 3.5 | +4.2 | 15.0.2: immutable and append-only volumes, volume encryption, ClamAV and malware hash checks |
| 2024 | Management at scale and automation | 3.5 → 4 | +0.6 | 15.0.2: installation manager; official Ansible collection |
| 2024 | Security and compliance | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | 15.0.2: TOTP console authentication |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03 | 15.0.2: Bacula Installation Manager | D10 Scale and automation | C |
| 2024-03 | 15.0.2: Kubernetes CSI snapshot plugin | D11 Ecosystem openness | V |
| 2024-03 | 15.0.2: TOTP console authentication | D9 Security | C |
| 2024-03 | 15.0.2: ZSTD compression, new cloud driver | D5 Storage efficiency | C |
| 2024-03 | 15.0.2: immutable and append-only volumes | D4 Cyber resilience | M |
| 2024-03 | 15.0.2: volume encryption, ClamAV plugin, malware hash checks | D4 Cyber resilience | M |
| 2025-03 | 15.0.3: enforced malware database download | D4 Cyber resilience | M |
| 2026-08 | 17.0.0: catalog 1027, IBM lin_tape integration | D8 Retention and tape | C |
- Centre of gravity: Cyber resilience (3), Security (1), Storage efficiency (1)
- Driver mix: Vision 12%, Customer need 50%, Market window 38%, Upstream 0%, Portfolio 0%
Credibility: 15.5 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 3 | About one release a year (15.0.2 2024, 15.0.3 2025, 17.0.0 2026) |
| Roadmap transparency | 2.5 | Release notes and GitLab public; issues and merge requests disabled, bug tracker on MantisBT; no public roadmap |
| Say-do | 4 | 10 of 10 items shipped, but most were taken from beta notes of the same release |
| Velocity | 2.5 | Commits fell from 1,142 (2023) to 196 (2024), 26 (2025) and 5 (2026 to date) |
| Lifecycle stability | 3.5 | Long-lived lines with in-place catalog upgrades |
Say-do record, 2023 to 2026: 10 forward items, 10 shipped, typically 4.7 months from beta notes to release. A weak test: the items came from beta notes, not an independent roadmap.
Sustainability risk: 15.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Maintainer concentration | 4 | Over 75% of commits since 2021 from baculasystems.com |
| Backer health | 2.5 | Bacula Systems is a going concern, but its effort goes to the Enterprise edition |
| Licence-change risk | 3 | Copyright assignment to Bacula Systems / Kern Sibbald makes relicensing possible |
| Abandonment signs | 3 | Commit activity collapsed in 2025-2026 even though 17.0.0 shipped |
| Security response | 2.5 | No public advisory process found |
Project health: Last release 2026-08-06. Commits per year: 1,602 (2022), 1,142 (2023), 196 (2024), 26 (2025), 5 (2026 to 1 Oct). Distinct authors fell from 26 to 2. Issues tracked on MantisBT, not GitLab.
Technical lock-in: 10.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 3 | Proprietary Bacula volume format (BB03 since 15.0.2) |
| Export path | 1.5 | bextract and bls read volumes without Director or catalog |
| Stack coupling | 2.5 | Director, Storage and File daemons plus a SQL catalog; web UI needs PHP |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 0 | Any POSIX storage, tape or S3; no phone-home |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 3 | Complex configuration; Bacula-specific skills |
Support and ecosystem: 14.0 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Paid support | 3 | Paid support is through Bacula Enterprise, not the community edition |
| Consultants and partners | 3.5 | Regional integrators; Bacula Administrator I and II certification |
| Documentation | 4 | Manual of more than 1,200 pages; REST API documented in Swagger |
| Community and packaging | 3.5 | Packaged in Debian, Ubuntu, EPEL, openSUSE (often old versions); mailing list since 2001 |
AI leverage: 1.5 / 20
| Strand | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|
| AI for protection / protecting AI | 0 | none |
| AI platform stack | 0 | none |
| AI-assisted operations | 0 | none |
| Agent openness | 1.5 | 2019: Baculum REST API |
No machine-learning feature. Malware detection in 15.0.2 is signature and hash based, which this Ledger does not count as AI.
Reading
Bacula Community is still a capable tape-first backup system, and 15.0.2 brought real ransomware defences (immutable volumes, malware checks). But everything that matters for VMware leavers, agentless VM and database plugins, is reserved for Bacula Enterprise, and community development has nearly stopped since 2024. Treat it as a stable engine for file and tape backup, not as a growing platform.
Open questions and evidence caveats
- Commit counts come from the GitLab API; the 2026 count (5) may miss work pushed in bulk before 17.0.0.
- Issue-age metrics are not available because GitLab issues are disabled.
- Bacula Enterprise is scored in the commercial Ledger, not here.
Related reading
More from Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Open-Source Backup Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Amanda Community: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- BackupPC: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Bareos: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Barman: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- BorgBackup: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Burp: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Kopia: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Percona XtraBackup: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- pgBackRest: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Proxmox Backup Server: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Relax-and-Recover: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- restic: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- UrBackup: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- WAL-G: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026
- Xen Orchestra: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026