Rubrik Security Cloud: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
Rubrik is extending backup security into identity and AI-agent resilience.
Part of the Enterprise Backup Ledger (edition 2026-10-03). How the scores work: methodology.
Snapshot
- Tier: Leader incumbent
- Owner: Rubrik; April 2024 IPO recorded, with Laminar/Predibase/Strata acquisitions separately dated.
- Licence model: Current CDM/RSC tier entitlements and list prices incomplete; MSP PayGo zero minimums announced March 2026.
- Products scored: CDM/RSC data-centre protection; Agent Cloud is separate and contributes only explicitly labelled AI strand observations.
- Latest release: CDM latest GA/build not found; RSC MCP private preview, separate clock
- Next signal: MCP GA: 2026-10 per 2026-09-15 press release; Japanese page snippet targets 2026-09-30, failed opening
- Archetype: Backup security expansion
- Evidence grade: B. History rebuilt from a reviewer fact pass with mostly grade-A dates (rubrik.com read via Wayback); some CDM 6.0 items grade B.
Scope of the scores: Product capability cutoff 2026-10-01; scoring edition 2026-10-03. Combined portfolio scores do not imply one SKU or uniform feature parity. History is evidence-bounded; freezes and first-feature GA dates can be incomplete. AI services named in the AI section do not broaden the ten core domains.
Scorecard
| Dimension | Score | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Capability today | 85.4 / 100 | higher is better |
| Momentum since end of 2022 | +6.2 points | higher is better |
| Credibility | 13.5 / 25 | higher is better |
| Commercial risk | 12.5 / 25 | lower is better |
| Technical lock-in | 14.0 / 25 | lower is better |
| Integrator fit | 15.0 / 20 | higher is better |
| AI leverage | 8.0 / 20 | higher is better |
| Ledger Index | 63.1 / 100 | balanced weights |
Capability by domain
Scores 0 to 5 against fixed anchors; total is weighted to 100.
| Domain (weight) | 2016 | 2019 | 2022 | Today |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual and physical servers (12) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4.5 |
| Databases and applications (12) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4.5 |
| Recovery (14) | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Cyber resilience (14) | 1.5 | 3 | 4 | 4.5 |
| Storage efficiency and targets (10) | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Long-term retention and tape (6) | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 |
| Replication and DR (10) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Security and compliance (8) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 |
| New-platform support (VMware exit) (8) | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Management at scale and automation (6) | 3 | 4 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Total / 100 | 53.0 | 73.0 | 79.2 | 85.4 |
Year by year: 2016: 53.0 · 2017: 67.0 · 2018: 70.2 · 2019: 73.0 · 2020: 73.6 · 2021: 77.2 · 2022: 79.2 · 2023: 81.8 · 2024: 82.6 · 2025: 83.4 · 2026: 85.4
What moved the score
| Year | Domain | Change | Points | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Cyber resilience | 1.5 → 2.5 | +2.8 | Alta 4.0/4.1 (2017): explicitly immutable backups; Glacier Vault Lock archive. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2017 | Databases and applications | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | Alta 4.0: Oracle RMAN/ASM, SQL Server Live Mount. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2017 | Long-term retention and tape | 2 → 2.5 | +0.6 | Tape only through the QStar partner product (4.0); Glacier archive. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2017 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 0 → 3 | +4.8 | Alta 4.0: Nutanix AHV agentless. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2017 | Recovery | 3.5 → 4 | +1.4 | Alta 4.0/4.1: CloudOn cross-platform restore VMware to AWS (2017-06) and Azure (2017-09). Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2017 | Replication and DR | 3 → 3.5 | +1.0 | CloudOn DR to AWS (2017-06) and Azure (2017-09). Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2017 | Storage efficiency and targets | 3.5 → 4 | +1.0 | Alta 4.1: GCP and Glacier archive; tape through QStar from 4.0. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2017 | Virtual and physical servers | 3 → 3.5 | +1.2 | Alta 4.0 (2017-06): Hyper-V and Nutanix AHV agentless; Windows physical (3.1, 2017-02). Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2018 | Cyber resilience | 2.5 → 3 | +1.4 | Polaris Radar ML anomaly / ransomware detection GA 2018-07-25. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2018 | Management at scale and automation | 3 → 3.5 | +0.6 | Polaris SaaS control plane (2018-04). Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2018 | Virtual and physical servers | 3.5 → 4 | +1.2 | Alta 4.2 (2018-06): AIX and Solaris. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2019 | Databases and applications | 3.5 → 4 | +1.2 | Andes 5.0 (GA 2019-01-31): Oracle Live Mount, SAP-certified HANA; Exchange since 4.2 (2018). Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2019 | Management at scale and automation | 3.5 → 4 | +0.6 | Terraform provider v1.0 (2019-01); Ansible modules. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2019 | Replication and DR | 3.5 → 4 | +1.0 | Andes 5.1 (2019-08): VMware CDP; Polaris AppFlows DR orchestration to AWS. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2020 | Long-term retention and tape | 2.5 → 3 | +0.6 | Andes 5.3 (2020-11): smart tiering to cold archive. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2021 | Cyber resilience | 3 → 3.5 | +1.4 | S3 Object Lock 2021-11; mass ransomware recovery. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2021 | Recovery | 4 → 4.5 | +1.4 | CDM 6.0 (2021-07): mass/bulk ransomware recovery, in-place reverse-CBT VMware recovery; Windows bare metal since Andes 5.0. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2021 | Security and compliance | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | CDM 6.0: TOTP MFA; global MFA enforcement. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2022 | Cyber resilience | 3.5 → 4 | +1.4 | Threat hunting (announced 2021-12), threat containment (2022-05), Rubrik Cloud Vault isolated vault (early 2022). Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2022 | Management at scale and automation | 4 → 4.5 | +0.6 | Rubrik Security Cloud (2022-05) central management with multi-tenancy. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2023 | Cyber resilience | 4 → 4.5 | +1.4 | Rubrik Cyber Recovery: isolated clean-room recovery and recovery-plan testing, GA early 2023. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2023 | Databases and applications | 4 → 4.5 | +1.2 | CDM 8.x: Db2 incl. HA/DR (8.1, 2023). Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2024 | Security and compliance | 4 → 4.5 | +0.8 | RSC quorum (multi-person) authorization by 2024-05; FedRAMP RSC Government 2024. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2025 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 3 → 3.5 | +0.8 | OpenShift Virtualization supported (2025-02); OpenStack announced 2025-06. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2026 | New-platform support (VMware exit) | 3.5 → 4 | +0.8 | Oracle Linux Virtualization Manager GA 2026-01; Proxmox VE GA 2026-04; no XCP-ng or proven cross-hypervisor restore. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
| 2026 | Virtual and physical servers | 4 → 4.5 | +1.2 | RSC: Oracle Linux Virtualization Manager GA 2026-01, Proxmox VE GA 2026-04. Source: Ledger review fact pass, 2026-10-03 |
Direction, 2023 to 2026
Each item carries one theme and one driver (V vision, C customer need, M market window, U upstream, P portfolio).
| Date | Item | Theme | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04 | Zscaler DLP integration: partial; By2024-04-10 Government launch; first GA unresolved. Later Government press lists integration; developer instructions remain login-gated. Deadline fulfillment not established. | D10 Scale and automation | C |
| 2023-05 | User Intelligence time-series access risk: partial; Original first GA unresolved. EPE2024 documents access-policy/data activity insight; feature identity/first deadline still uncertain. | D10 Scale and automation | C |
| 2023-08 | VMware AI-guided cyber recovery: pending; First GA unverified. Azure OpenAI task recommendations; layered clean-file recovery over gold-master VM described in future tense. Demo is not GA. | D4 Cyber resilience | C |
| 2023-11 | Ruby assistant: pending; not found. Initial promise specifies coming months and opt-in; first matching rollout/build remains unverified. | D7 AI-assisted operations | V |
| 2024-03 | EPE DSPM cloud/on-prem: shipped; 2024-03-12 assertion. Primary GA press; entitlement edition specified, exact RSC rollout/build not exposed. | D10 Scale and automation | C |
| 2024-08 | Mandiant threat feeds and Google clean room: partial; By2024-08-07; original GA unresolved. Threat-intelligence integration/clean-room collaboration; native on-prem release cross-check unresolved. | D4 Cyber resilience | C |
| 2024-12 | Cloud Vault on AWS: shipped; By2025-03-04 release announcement; first day unresolved. March release and availability blog corroborate managed immutable AWS archive; not on-prem CDM GA. | D4 Cyber resilience | C |
| 2025-04 | Identity Resilience: partial; First GA unresolved. June2026 adds Identity Continuity and Roll Forward; this does not date original suite GA. | D9 Security | C |
| 2025-09 | Agent Rewind: partial; Included in Agent Cloud GA2026-02-18; first stand-alone GA unresolved. Announcement referred to August2025 Rewind; September 9 results are later, not original launch. February GA blog describes restore of affected assets from snapshots; workload coverage and first independent GA remain unresolved. | D10 Scale and automation | C |
| 2025-09 | Amazon DynamoDB protection: partial; First release unresolved. Separate cloud service; release-by-release first availability still needs verification. | D10 Scale and automation | C |
| 2025-09 | Amazon RDS PostgreSQL immutability: partial; First release unresolved. Separate AWS database service capability; no inference of on-prem PostgreSQL delivery. | D2 Databases and applications | C |
| 2026-06 | Autonomous Business Recovery for Cloud Applications: pending; GA not established. Dependencies across code/configuration/identity/data; automated network then compute then data restoration. Explicit Private Preview prevents recording launch as GA. | D3 Recovery | C |
| 2026-06 | Identity Continuity / Roll Forward: partial; Versioned GA unresolved. August 27 results reiterate capabilities; backup and identity components have distinct clocks. | D9 Security | C |
| 2026-06 | Rubrik AI agentic recovery: partial; Customer-use claim by 2026-09-15; first GA unresolved. June 9 claim compared with September 15 customer-use statement; release-note and permissions audit incomplete. | D7 AI-assisted operations | V |
| 2026-09 | Official MCP: pending; not found. Target dates conflict; installable docs do not prove GA | D11 Ecosystem openness | V |
- Centre of gravity: Scale and automation (5), Cyber resilience (3), AI-assisted operations (2)
- Driver mix: Vision 20%, Customer need 80%, Market window 0%, Upstream 0%, Portfolio 0%
Credibility: 13.5 / 25
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence | 3 | 13 recorded release rows, including maintenance and component overlaps; rows are not distinct GA counts. Regularity judged from the dated tables, not an asserted promised cadence. Ruby (2023-11-07): Announced; earliest GA not found Evidence A. ruby |
| Roadmap transparency | 2 | Public documentation access and versioned release evidence determine this score. Accepted roadmap finding: not found; press and developer documentation used. No open-roadmap-tracker reference score is awarded. Ruby (2023-11-07): Announced; earliest GA not found Evidence A. ruby |
| Say-do | 2.5 | Recorded ledger: 34 items; 6 shipped, 14 partial, 0 slipped, 14 pending, 0 dropped. Mature dated prospective cohort: 17; 2 documented within 12 calendar months, 0 later than 12 months, 15 unresolved. Month-only/ambiguous clocks, same-day release notices and post-release blogs are excluded from that cohort. Pending is unverified, not failure; the ledger is a bounded sample. Evidence C for the rubric estimate: calibrated to the delivery record below, not a measured census percentage. See the vendor research section F. |
| Velocity | 3.5 | Substantive capabilities in the release tables determine velocity; maintenance-only rows do not become new features. RSC shared-cluster MSP capabilities (2026-09-24 early access; GA later 2026 target): Tenant accounts, network connectors, cross-cluster replication. Per-tenant cryptographic isolation/customer keys still roadmap. Evidence A. mspSep26 |
| Lifecycle stability | 2.5 | Major CDM releases generally 18 months; minor releases inherit major EOS per accepted lifecycle example. 2021-07-20: CDM 6.0.0: GA date from lifecycle example; feature reconstruction not found Evidence A. life |
Say-do record, 2023 to 2026: Recorded ledger: 34 items; 6 shipped, 14 partial, 0 slipped, 14 pending, 0 dropped. Mature dated prospective cohort: 17; 2 documented within 12 calendar months, 0 later than 12 months, 15 unresolved. Month-only/ambiguous clocks, same-day release notices and post-release blogs are excluded from that cohort. Pending is unverified, not failure; the ledger is a bounded sample.
Commercial risk: 12.5 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Price and licence volatility | 2.5 | 2023 to cutoff model/packaging observations are distinguished from historical introductions. Without a reconstructed price series this is a provisional estimate, not a measured price increase. 2024-04-24: IPO priced 23.5m ClassA shares at 32USD; April 25 trading/April 29 closing targets are prospective Evidence C. ipo |
| Purchase constraints | 2.5 | MSP zero-minimum PayGo is documented, but universal enterprise minimums and tier contracts remain unknown. 2026-03-18: MSP PayGo starts with zero minimums then contractual scale; new MSP benefit tiers and 24/7 incident response live. Rubrik Verified separately planned for summer. No unit price stated. Evidence C. mspMarch26 |
| Channel and access | 3 | Partner entry and public documentation access are both considered. Research documentation finding: table. Official automation: Python and PowerShell tools; GraphQL/REST; Task-Based REST Beta Evidence A. dev; tools |
| Owner stability | 1 | IPO is not an acquisition or forced ownership merger; low owner-change risk relative to recently merged portfolios. 2024-04: SEC filing confirms IPO completed during April; exact closing day not established Evidence A. sec |
| Cost of staying supported | 3.5 | Support/upgrade constraints, distinct from licence-expiry restoration: CDM major releases: 18 months from GA; minor/patch releases inherit major EOS. Lifecycle example 6.0 EOS 2023-01-19.. 2021-09-01 settlement announcement: Commvault reports an amicable agreement resolving all outstanding patent litigation with Rubrik. Public blog does not disclose payments or licensing terms; no court finding of infringement or corresponding Cohesity outcome is inferred. Evidence C. rubrikSettlement21 |
Security record of the product itself: No in-scope match located in the accepted security-record.md manual product-name filter of the CISA 2026-09-30 catalogue; no deduction. This is not an exhaustive advisory audit or a claim of no exploitation. Arcserve CVE-2015-4068 was added to KEV in 2022, outside the adjustment window. Adjacent array/infrastructure/hosting-plugin CVEs are excluded. Security record: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue and vendor advisories.
Technical lock-in: 14.0 / 25 (lower is better)
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Formats | 3.5 | 2026-10-01 evidence boundary: Independent backup-format specification/readability is not established in the accepted research. Provisional format-dependency estimate, not proof that only a running licensed instance can read it. Provisional rubric estimate; unknown terms are not evidence of either zero risk or the worst terms. Evidence C. |
| Export path | 2.5 | 2026-10-01 evidence boundary: Independent data extraction and post-licence restoration terms are incomplete. Provisional export estimate, not proof of no export or licence-required restore. Provisional rubric estimate; unknown terms are not evidence of either zero risk or the worst terms. Evidence C. |
| Stack coupling | 2.5 | The documented component/management stack is considered; cross-workload or cross-hypervisor recovery is not inferred from an API. API access: RSC GraphQL and CDM REST differ. Product RBAC and entitlements still apply. Evidence C. dev |
| Hardware / cloud coupling | 3 | Deployment/service dependencies determine this score; missing offline/hardware terms are a provisional estimate. API access: RSC GraphQL and CDM REST differ. Product RBAC and entitlements still apply. Evidence C. dev |
| Skills and tooling coupling | 2.5 | Named training and product-specific administration imply some skills coupling; no unsourced scarcity/headcount claim. Official automation: Python and PowerShell tools; GraphQL/REST; Task-Based REST Beta Evidence A. dev; tools |
Integrator fit: 15.0 / 20
| Criterion | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Partner programme openness | 4 | Published partner routes and entry/tier qualifications earn credit; undisclosed obligations limit the score. Official automation: Python and PowerShell tools; GraphQL/REST; Task-Based REST Beta Evidence A. dev; tools |
| Multi-tenancy and self-service | 3.5 | Documented tenant/provider isolation and self-service earn credit; reporting or multi-site visibility alone does not prove billing/tenant self-service. Observed by 2026-10-01: RSC GraphQL / CDM REST; Task-Based REST explicitly Beta Evidence C. r52; ruby; dev |
| API and infrastructure-as-code | 4 | Official Terraform and GraphQL/CDM REST; support entitlements remain separate. Terraform registry observation 2026-10-01: rubrikinc/rubrik: 50,978 total downloads; current version 1.10.0, published 2026-09-07. Publisher source repository: https://github.com/rubrikinc/terraform-provider-rubrik. Counts are registry requests/downloads, not distinct installations; vendor support obligations are separate. Evidence A. regapi |
| Skills and certification | 3.5 | Partner credentials/Academy evidence exists, but complete named exam structure is incomplete. Official automation: Python and PowerShell tools; GraphQL/REST; Task-Based REST Beta Evidence C. dev; tools |
AI leverage: 8.0 / 20
| Strand | Today | Latest step |
|---|---|---|
| AI for protection / protecting AI | 3.5 | 2026: 2025-10-22 early access →2026-02-18 GA; Separate Agent Cloud service GA: Agent Rewind relates destructive changes to healthy backup snapshots; asset recovery described. This is agent-action resilience, not proved vector/model-registry backup. Agent Rewind GA adds agent-action recovery; no vector/model-consistency assertion. Evidence A. rac; racga |
| AI platform stack | 0.5 | 2026: 2025-07 acquisition /2026-08-27 availability claim; Restricted availability: Predibase model customization/serving acquisition plus Annapurna enterprise data layer; Annapurna available to qualified enterprise partners. Not blanket GA of the complete AI stack. Annapurna restricted partners; only half-step for non-GA availability. Evidence A. sec26; results26 |
| AI-assisted operations | 1 | 2026: 2026-06-09 /2026-09-15; Launch plus customer-use claim: Rubrik AI reasons/acts across RSC and RAC, orchestrates recovery; auditable/attributable/reversible guardrails claimed. Concrete tool scopes, consent workflow and audit-retention details remain unverified. Customer-use/launch claim without explicit first-GA or tool approval contract; at most half-step over prior preview. Evidence A. agent26; mcp |
| Agent openness | 3 | 2026: 2026-09-15; private preview: Official MCP. Python tool provides policy gates for write actions; no GA confirmation found. Specific AI openness anchor: official MCP private preview is 3; no GA4/5. Evidence A. mcp; mcpdocs |
AI say-do sample: 6 recorded announcement rows; 0 GA/shipped matches, 1 preview/early/limited at announcement, 3 partial, 3 pending, 0 slipped, 0 dropped. Preview-at-announcement overlaps outcome counts. These are promise-row counts, not unique announcements or counts of released AI features; omissions/overlaps in the AI research ledger are preserved. "Shipped" may be a vendor availability assertion rather than an independently verified first-GA day.
Reading
Rubrik is extending backup security into identity and AI-agent resilience. The record establishes Radar, database integrations and Agent Cloud delivery, with several recovery-agent and MCP announcements still outside confirmed GA. Restricted release documentation and unresolved CDM exit terms limit confidence in the broader portfolio scores.
Open questions and evidence caveats
- Unchanged annual values carry the last scored release; they do not certify a frozen compatibility matrix or exact first-feature GA. Some checkpoint-derived jumps may lag the true first shipment.
- Unverified AI strands receive zero credited evidence; this is a conservative estimate rather than a vendor-wide absence claim. Preview/limited capabilities add at most half a point beyond the preceding established score.
- Say-do counts are a bounded research sample. Same-day/release-note announcements and post-release blogs are not promises delivered instantly. Missing outcome dates do not prove non-delivery.
- Commercial/exit terms not reconstructed use explicit provisional midpoint estimates; executed regional contracts may differ.
- cyber: 2016 baseline is provisional; no frozen checkpoint fact.
- retention: 2016 baseline is provisional; no frozen checkpoint fact.
- platforms: 2016 baseline is provisional; no frozen checkpoint fact.
- Historical 2022 cells often carry Alta/Andes facts; no later feature is backdated. No core mass/BMR/cleanroom reference score is earned solely from Agent Cloud announcements. Official MCP remains private preview at cutoff.
- Review 2026-10-03: capability history rebuilt from a dated fact pass (Rubrik first-GA dates for 40 items); tier restored to leader as in the topic sheet.
Related reading
- Related Ledger: Nutanix in the VM Platform Ledger 2026
- Related Ledger: Proxmox VE in the VM Platform Ledger 2026
- VMware backup in 2026
More from Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Overview: all platforms side by side
- Enterprise Backup Ledger Methodology: How Every Score Is Built
- Acronis Cyber Protect: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Arcserve UDP: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Bacula Enterprise: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Cohesity DataProtect / NetBackup: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Commvault Cloud: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Dell: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Druva Enterprise Workloads: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- HPE Zerto: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Huawei OceanProtect DataBackup: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- HYCU R-Cloud: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- IBM Storage Defender / Storage Protect: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- NAKIVO Backup & Replication: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- OpenText Data Protector: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Sangfor backup / DR software candidate: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Storware Backup and Recovery: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026
- Veeam Data Platform: Enterprise Backup Ledger 2026