Mr.PlanB Logo

    #6 of 16 open-source backup tools · Updated October 2026

    WAL-G review 2026

    WAL-G · Multi-company collective

    WAL-G ranks #6 of 16 open-source backup tools in the Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 61.3 out of 100. WAL-G is the broadest database backup tool here, covering PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis and more with fast cloud-native backups.

    Scores

    Ledger Index
    61.3/100
    #6 of 16
    Capability
    62.8/100
    Credibility
    20.5/25
    Sustainability risk
    6.5/25
    lower is better
    Lock-in
    2.5/25
    lower is better
    AI delivery
    1/20

    Source: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026, edition 2026-10-02. How each score works: methodology.

    Pros

    • Databases and applications5/5
    • Recovery4/5
    • Storage efficiency and targets4/5

    Cons

    • Virtual and physical servers0.5/5
    • New-platform support (VMware exit)0.5/5

    What the Ledger says

    WAL-G is the broadest database backup tool here, covering PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis and more with fast cloud-native backups. No single vendor stands behind it, which spreads risk but means support comes from consultancies.

    No AI features.

    Capability by area

    Virtual and physical servers0.5/5
    Databases and applications5/5
    Recovery4/5
    Cyber resilience3.5/5
    Storage efficiency and targets4/5
    Long-term retention and tape3/5
    Replication and DR3.5/5
    Security and compliance3.5/5
    New-platform support (VMware exit)0.5/5
    Management at scale and automation3/5

    Buying, lock-in and release record

    Buying and licence (sustainability risk)(lower is better)

    Maintainer concentration1
    Broad author base; no author above about 40%
    Backer health2.5
    No single backer; several companies contribute
    Licence-change risk1
    Apache-2.0
    Abandonment signs0.5
    Active
    Security response1.5
    govulncheck pipeline added 2026

    Technical lock-in(lower is better)

    Formats0.5
    Restores standard database files
    Export path0.5
    Standard data files
    Stack coupling0.5
    Single Go binary
    Hardware / cloud coupling0
    Any object or local storage
    Skills and tooling coupling1
    Database skills

    Release credibility

    Cadence4
    3 to 10 releases a year
    Roadmap transparency4
    Public issues and PRs
    Say-do4.5
    5 of 5 shipped within 3 to 5 months
    Velocity4.5
    20 to 29 distinct authors a year
    Lifecycle stability3.5
    3.0 major in 2024; per-engine maturity varies

    Partners and services

    Paid support2.5
    Consultancies only
    Consultants and partners3
    Used in Patroni/Spilo and by DevOps consultancies
    Documentation3
    Docs in the repository
    Community and packaging3.5
    Release binaries; large user base in Kubernetes PostgreSQL

    Alternatives to WAL-G

    Questions about WAL-G

    Is WAL-G any good?

    WAL-G ranks #6 of 16 open-source backup tools in the Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 61.3 out of 100. Its strongest areas are databases and applications, recovery, storage efficiency and targets. Its weakest are virtual and physical servers, new-platform support (vmware exit).

    What are the best alternatives to WAL-G?

    The closest by Ledger Index are XtraBackup (61.3), Barman (62.6), pgBackRest (63.9), Kopia (58.3).

    How is WAL-G licensed and sold?

    Broad author base; no author above about 40%.

    How much lock-in does WAL-G bring?

    WAL-G scores 2.5 out of 25 on technical lock-in (lower is better). Export path: Standard data files.

    User reviews of WAL-G

    No reviews yet

    Be the first to say how WAL-G worked for you.

    Write a review

    No account needed and no email asked. We read every review before it appears and remove adverts, spam and personal attacks.

    Your rating