Mr.PlanB Logo

    #16 of 16 open-source backup tools · Updated October 2026

    Amanda review 2026

    Amanda Community · Dormant

    Amanda ranks #16 of 16 open-source backup tools in the Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 31.6 out of 100. Amanda was once a reference for tape backup, and its plain tar format still makes old backups easy to read.

    Scores

    Ledger Index
    31.6/100
    #16 of 16
    Capability
    39.8/100
    Credibility
    6/25
    Sustainability risk
    21/25
    lower is better
    Lock-in
    5/25
    lower is better
    AI delivery
    0.5/20

    Source: Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026, edition 2026-10-02. How each score works: methodology.

    Pros

    No domain scores 4 or higher out of 5.

    Cons

    • Databases and applications1/5
    • New-platform support (VMware exit)1/5
    • Cyber resilience1.5/5

    What the Ledger says

    Amanda was once a reference for tape backup, and its plain tar format still makes old backups easy to read. The community project has not released since July 2023 or committed since January 2024, and its owner invests only in the proprietary Zmanda product. Do not start new deployments on it; plan a migration for existing ones.

    No AI features; the project is not developing.

    Capability by area

    Virtual and physical servers2/5
    Databases and applications1/5
    Recovery2.5/5
    Cyber resilience1.5/5
    Storage efficiency and targets2.5/5
    Long-term retention and tape3.5/5
    Replication and DR2.5/5
    Security and compliance2/5
    New-platform support (VMware exit)1/5
    Management at scale and automation2/5

    Buying, lock-in and release record

    Buying and licence (sustainability risk)(lower is better)

    Maintainer concentration5
    No active maintainers
    Backer health4.5
    BETSOL develops only the proprietary Zmanda product
    Licence-change risk2
    Permissive licence; corporate copyright holders
    Abandonment signs5
    Fails both near-dormant tests: 38 months without a release, no committers
    Security response4.5
    No security process

    Technical lock-in(lower is better)

    Formats0.5
    Standard tar and dump archives
    Export path0.5
    Restorable with dd and tar, without Amanda
    Stack coupling1
    Simple C and Perl stack
    Hardware / cloud coupling0
    Any tape, disk or S3
    Skills and tooling coupling3
    Legacy, scarce skills

    Release credibility

    Cadence1
    No release since July 2023
    Roadmap transparency2
    Public repository; no roadmap
    Say-do1.5
    2 of 5 items shipped; the 3.6 release and a web UI were dropped
    Velocity0.5
    Zero commits since January 2024
    Lifecycle stability1
    No maintenance; build fixes for current compilers left open

    Partners and services

    Paid support0.5
    No paid support for the community edition
    Consultants and partners1
    A few legacy consultants
    Documentation2
    Man pages; wiki largely unmaintained
    Community and packaging2.5
    Still packaged by Linux distributions; forums quiet

    Alternatives to Amanda

    Questions about Amanda

    Is Amanda any good?

    Amanda ranks #16 of 16 open-source backup tools in the Open-Source Backup Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 31.6 out of 100. Its weakest are databases and applications, new-platform support (vmware exit), cyber resilience.

    What are the best alternatives to Amanda?

    The closest by Ledger Index are BackupPC (33.9), Burp (35.2), UrBackup (46.7), Bacula (51.8).

    How is Amanda licensed and sold?

    No active maintainers.

    How much lock-in does Amanda bring?

    Amanda scores 5 out of 25 on technical lock-in (lower is better). Export path: Restorable with dd and tar, without Amanda.

    User reviews of Amanda

    No reviews yet

    Be the first to say how Amanda worked for you.

    Write a review

    No account needed and no email asked. We read every review before it appears and remove adverts, spam and personal attacks.

    Your rating