Mr.PlanB Logo

    #16 of 18 firewall and router platforms · Updated October 2026

    IPFire review 2026

    IPFire · Dependable builder

    IPFire ranks #16 of 18 firewall and router platforms in the Firewall and Router Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 48.1 out of 100. IPFire is a free zone-based firewall with inline Suricata IPS and a steady update rhythm, but no high availability, API or official hypervisor list.

    Scores

    Ledger Index
    48.1/100
    #16 of 18
    Capability
    56.2/100
    Credibility
    15.5/25
    Commercial risk
    10/25
    lower is better
    Lock-in
    6.5/25
    lower is better
    AI delivery
    0.5/20

    Source: Firewall and Router Ledger 2026, edition 2026-10-16. How each score works: methodology.

    Pros

    No domain scores 4 or higher out of 5.

    Cons

    • High availability and performance1/5
    • Management, API and automation2/5
    • Routing and WAN2.5/5

    What the Ledger says

    IPFire earns its points in threat protection and the VPN set, where inline Suricata, the new DNS Firewall, WireGuard and a rebuilt OpenVPN give a small site more filtering than most free firewalls, and in buyer safety, because there is nothing to buy and nothing to export from except text files. The scores stop where the product stops: no failover, no API, no central management, dynamic routing only through a command-line add-on and no official statement on which hypervisors it supports. The sustainability risk sits in the middle because the project is twenty years old and ships every few weeks, yet depends on a handful of developers and one small company. A buyer should check IPv6 support against their needs before choosing it, because the research did not assess it and the firewall line is scored without it.

    IPFire uses no AI in detection or operations and announces none. Without an API there is nothing for an agent to drive beyond SSH.

    Capability by area

    Routing and WAN2.5/5
    Firewall and NAT core3/5
    VPN and remote access3.5/5
    Threat protection3.5/5
    Network services3.5/5
    Platform and hypervisor freedom3/5
    High availability and performance1/5
    Management, API and automation2/5
    Observability2.5/5
    Platform security and lifecycle3/5

    Buying, lock-in and release record

    Buying and licence (commercial risk)(lower is better)

    Maintainer concentration3.5
    Six named core developers inside a 31-person team; one lead developer has carried the project since 2004
    Backer health3
    Sponsor donations and one small company, Lightning Wire Labs, that sells appliances and support; no foundation and no investors
    Licence-change risk1
    Open source without a single corporate owner; the licence name was not read from the project page
    Abandonment signs1
    Six Core Updates in 2026 and a project history since 2004
    Security response1.5
    Kernel and library fixes ship in regular Core Updates and no KEV entries exist; no central advisory page was found

    Technical lock-in(lower is better)

    Formats1.5
    Plain text configuration under /var/ipfire and a backup archive
    Export path2
    Readable text configuration; no converter to other firewalls
    Stack coupling0.5
    Runs alone with any upstream and any switch
    Hardware / cloud coupling0.5
    Any x86-64 or aarch64 machine, fully offline
    Skills and tooling coupling2
    Own colour zone model and Pakfire package manager; general Linux skills transfer partly

    Release credibility

    Cadence3.5
    A Core Update every one to two months with a testing release announced first (199 in January, 200 in March, 201 in April, 202 in May, 203 in July, 204 in October 2026); no published schedule
    Roadmap transparency3
    Release notes per update and blog posts that explain direction; a bug tracker exists; no written roadmap
    Say-do3
    Few promises on record; the DNS Firewall named as the next milestone in March 2026 shipped in the next update; the DBL blocklist GA status is unconfirmed
    Velocity3
    One or two substantive items per Core Update (WireGuard, DNS Firewall, Knot Resolver, Wi-Fi 7 AP) around kernel and library updates
    Lifecycle stability3
    Rolling model with one supported branch and in-place upgrades; the Unbound to Knot Resolver swap caused a regression fixed one update later

    Partners and services

    Partner programme openness1.5
    No partner programme found; Lightning Wire Labs sells appliances and support
    Multi-tenancy and self-service0.5
    None
    API and infrastructure-as-code0.5
    No API, Terraform or Ansible content found
    Skills and certification1
    Documentation and community forum; no training or certification found

    Alternatives to IPFire

    Questions about IPFire

    Is IPFire any good?

    IPFire ranks #16 of 18 firewall and router platforms in the Firewall and Router Ledger 2026, with a Ledger Index of 48.1 out of 100. Its weakest are high availability and performance, management, api and automation, routing and wan.

    What are the best alternatives to IPFire?

    The closest by Ledger Index are TNSR (48.6), Forcepoint NGFW (47.3), Arista NG Firewall (46.4), OpenWrt (51.8).

    How is IPFire licensed and sold?

    Six named core developers inside a 31-person team; one lead developer has carried the project since 2004.

    How much lock-in does IPFire bring?

    IPFire scores 6.5 out of 25 on technical lock-in (lower is better). Export path: Readable text configuration; no converter to other firewalls.

    User reviews of IPFire

    No reviews yet

    Be the first to say how IPFire worked for you.

    Write a review

    No account needed and no email asked. We read every review before it appears and remove adverts, spam and personal attacks.

    Your rating